Don't you think about how such pilots represent your faction?
I'll be honest. If this was the first time I encountered 5th in space and saw this happening, I'd have bad thoughts about the faction. If I didn't care at all, I'd not even make this post.
Edit: Don't even think about the guy who is in my group. He didn't even engage, 'cause he couldn't do so. He was flying a Pirate ID'd ship, who can't assist. Damn logic.
ehm tuta was me in that gunboat your problem you don't see i have at my six one ln indie silent engager thats i hate and an other come at norlfok for that i evade to fight if you want i can also leave for me is not a problem.
one question who is that you speak?
Edit: Don't even think about the guy who is in my group. He didn't even engage, 'cause he couldn't do so. He was flying a Pirate ID'd ship, who can't assist. Damn logic.
if is the spartial when meet me engage without said nothing he fire me and i simply reply his fire but i take a 40% of his shield for send him away.
and an other question how you know what happen if he is not in your group we are alone when he engage me without said nothing
If you're talking about the guy who was in my group, then he was a Pirate ID'd guy with Tridente, who didn't even open fire. I was the only one shooting you and your friend(s).
Whom are you talking about, who engaged you without saying anything? I can't remember anyone from my group doing that.
Hope I understood your questions right. But I couldn't really understand the first paragraph.
excuse my mistake i think you speak about the spartial.
and for the first part is the reason because i fly away in simple there was two ln indie who attack without notice ,for me is better let them die and evade to fight
Today I had an encounter with your admiral. All in activity is decent and I don't see much running around with caps like indie lolwuts. With regard to said encounter however, I think it's a good idea for the leader to always be present in a capital/flagship. If he/she wants to play in a snub maybe pick an alternate character who is obviously lower in the ranks. You may understand my amazement when I see a lonely 5th fighter and the admiral himself is in it. Granted I got wrecked, but what if I had wingmates? In the event of possible capturing an admiral inRP, the 1v1 unwritten PvP rules are largely negated. I hope you see where I am going with this. All in all, thumbs up from me.
Been having a lot of fun with you guys as Leon, all your members I've met so far have been top notch. Keep it up guys and I look forward to our next meeting.
You guys are fun to fly with in-game, but your forum presence isn't all that large and you haven't responded to a number of feedback posts in here, such as the advice provided by Pancakes here and some of what Lyth wrote. All in all, the original post of this thread seems to be a bit sparse.
PS: Props for the Latin motto that you have in your faction logo
I would like to make a question which I think several users have. What does the 5th offer differently in terms of roleplay than the current official Liberty Navy faction?
What I mean is that a faction seeks officiality either to fill an empty spot in a NPC faction which is not officially represented or to offer something different than the current official faction(s) of that NPC faction. However, at the moment, your RP is somewhat identical to what [LN] already offers, if not much more limited in terms of variation.
Don't get me wrong, I am not saying that you are not doing well, I am simply seeking to see the motives behind this request.
(03-24-2015, 06:39 PM)Mitko Wrote: Today I had an encounter with your admiral. All in activity is decent and I don't see much running around with caps like indie lolwuts. With regard to said encounter however, I think it's a good idea for the leader to always be present in a capital/flagship. If he/she wants to play in a snub maybe pick an alternate character who is obviously lower in the ranks. You may understand my amazement when I see a lonely 5th fighter and the admiral himself is in it. Granted I got wrecked, but what if I had wingmates? In the event of possible capturing an admiral inRP, the 1v1 unwritten PvP rules are largely negated. I hope you see where I am going with this. All in all, thumbs up from me.
Well the main reason i don't use my CAP so often is that when nothing serious happens eg.:Rheinland raid, or Magellan raid. It looks odd that a cap is just chilling somwhere in Liberty iRP wasting taxpayer money. However your idea about creating an alt is not bad and i already did that long ago but the thing is i did not use it so often(untill now).
Quote:Granted I got wrecked, but what if I had wingmates? In the event of possible capturing an admiral inRP
Good idea if somehow you tractor the escape pod before it gets too far away in case i don't have friends with me, and we are far from any stations/planets. And thanks for the feedback.
(03-27-2015, 03:45 PM)Teerin Wrote: You guys are fun to fly with in-game, but your forum presence isn't all that large and you haven't responded to a number of feedback posts in here, such as the advice provided by Pancakes here and some of what Lyth wrote. All in all, the original post of this thread seems to be a bit sparse.
PS: Props for the Latin motto that you have in your faction logo
Well we prefer to be active in game rather than forum but you are right. Even if we make in game activity our top priority we still have to place a reasonable ammount of forumRP too. We will work on it.
What Pancakes wrote made us think about what next but honestly i got stuck with it. The idea of a LNMP is really good. We recently came up with a new idea wich is "under construction". In the next 24 hours there will be a forum ready version and will update it. What lyth wrote was answered. I checked it and could not find any questions wich we did not answer. If we indeed missed one then sorry.
And again my bad but i don't see the problem with the motto in our logo. If you mean to change into something wich is easier to understand i could propably translate it. And thanks for the feedback again.
And again the grammar problems. Iam not sure who wrote it recently but they where checked and the lore itself was corrected. But we will check on it again just to be 100% sure.