(04-04-2015, 12:55 AM)Carter Wrote: Hawk please, Countless XA? The only time i've seen "countless" XA in space was a few months ago, ever since then things went quiet, your argument is invalid.
So my argument is invalid because you haven't seen many XA in a while? Where is the logic in that? I was one of the first people on this server to buy a salvager and I've been flying the same one for the last six years. I've seen plenty of them wrecked by XA.
I'll give you one thing though. Haste, the salvager does need a nerf. Its cargo capacity should have been nerfed a long time ago. I've never felt the salvager was a practical trade ship anyway. There are higher capacity ships that make me a lot more money and I'm good and not ending up in people's gun sights anyway so it's going to be the same to me with or without the regens. In fact I think I'm going to start flying mine without the regens just for the fun of it.
Quite frankly, I personally dont see the issue with the Salvager. It's more survivable than battletransports, but looking at the actual cost it costs the exact same at 100 million while having 1000 less cargo. As a survivable transport with less cargo, I believe it's balanced in terms of price vs defence and cargo. If you're arguing that it's more survivable and has more cargo than a pirate transport, then shouldnt we buff or nerf all transports to have the exact same comparable stats without factoring in price? Also keep in mind unlike all other small transports and some liners the ship doesnt actually have a CD either.
The main issue I have with the Salvager is that I dont think it should be able to actually mine things while having that level of cargo and survivability. So personally I'd like to see either its mining ability removed, which I think would act as a balance fix but not fit the lore or for its cargo to be reduced down to the 2900 level.
(04-04-2015, 12:55 AM)Carter Wrote: Hawk please, Countless XA? The only time i've seen "countless" XA in space was a few months ago, ever since then things went quiet, your argument is invalid.
So my argument is invalid because you haven't seen many XA in a while? Where is the logic in that? I was one of the first people on this server to buy a salvager and I've been flying the same one for the last six years. I've seen plenty of them wrecked by XA.
I'll give you one thing though. Haste, the salvager does need a nerf. Its cargo capacity should have been nerfed a long time ago. I've never felt the salvager was a practical trade ship anyway. There are higher capacity ships that make me a lot more money and I'm good and not ending up in people's gun sights anyway so it's going to be the same to me with or without the regens. In fact I think I'm going to start flying mine without the regens just for the fun of it.
I'm going to need an ingame name for this regenless Salvager.
(04-04-2015, 12:55 AM)Carter Wrote: Hawk please, Countless XA? The only time i've seen "countless" XA in space was a few months ago, ever since then things went quiet, your argument is invalid.
So my argument is invalid because you haven't seen many XA in a while? Where is the logic in that? I was one of the first people on this server to buy a salvager and I've been flying the same one for the last six years. I've seen plenty of them wrecked by XA.
Cool story bro, wanna hear mine? I was talking in general, aka .88, i didn't go back 6 years ago, those times are long gone and they should just no be mentioned ever again, keep in mind that grave digging is bad.
(04-04-2015, 03:15 AM)Hawk Wrote: There are higher capacity ships that make me a lot more money and I'm good and not ending up in people's gun sights anyway so it's going to be the same to me with or without the regens. In fact I think I'm going to start flying mine without the regens just for the fun of it.
Challange accepted, but don't ban/beam me if things go off hand.