Login

**Skorak** · 01-14-2016, 09:46 PM,

ID: Patricia Lyons [O]
Encryption: Standard
Date of Receiving: 1/14/823 A.S.

Junkers Congress or however one adresses you correctly,

doesn't matter I guess. Well I am adressing you because that little installation of yours is making trouble again.

I am rerouting this comm to you:

Message from the BHG

So you will get rid of the Hackers on your station and you will refuse them any further refuge.

You know we can get quite uncomfortable if we have to.

End of transmission.

Attachments: BHG Comm

**Skorak** · 01-17-2016, 12:35 PM,

ID: Patricia Lyons [O]
Encryption: Standard
Date of Receiving: 1/17/823 A.S.

Retransmitting

RicoValesquez · 01-18-2016, 02:52 AM,

Ello ello,

Yes this does seem to be some sort of guncam footage from an unsuccessful bounty hunter, apparently there were 6 of them to the one Lane Hacker... It's unfortunate that the 6 of them were not able to apprehend the criminal. I guess my question is then, is the bounty hunter wanting us to pay for the bounty of the criminal him and his army of bounty hunters not able to apprehend? Or are you wanting us to apprehend this criminal for you?

I've had my security forces check high and low in the installation for the criminal and we haven't been able to find a thing. Also, our record keeping is not great but I'm not even sure if the ship ever made berth on the station. We will continue looking for the criminal but if your question is whether or not you should pay the bounty hunter for the apprehension? Well that's up to you but I probably would not in your position.

Please let me know if I can be of assistance in the future.

Rico,

Login
Username:
Password:	Lost Password?
	Remember me