• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Welcome Help & Support
« Previous 1 … 108 109 110 111 112 … 495 Next »
Pilgrim Liner [Question]

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pilgrim Liner [Question]
Offline The Savage
02-03-2016, 01:05 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-03-2016, 02:06 PM by The Savage.)
#1
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

So I came across the Slaver Union and they still flew FL ID Pilgrims not being aware that they are not allowed to fly Pilgrim Liners. While making a small chat with them, the problem came out (a fair one I must say) that "they are Slavers, not Junkers" (when I proposed turning to Junker ID) and "it would be waste of time and money to revert to Serenity" (when proposed this). Idea of turning these ships into Pirate Train doesn't also seem a good idea, since these are 1) illegal and 2) it would be immersion breaking, since PTrains are rather destined to move cargo, not people. Giving them unlawful ID is also lack of sense, since they are disallowed to 90% of bases in Sirius, which DO BUY Slaves.


What's the actual status of the dev team onto Pilgrim Liner? I see no reason why their cargo has been increased or should not be allowed to Freelancer ID with exceptional line. Their price is actually big enough (200M) to not to see a lot of these right away, Pilgrim lacks CM and is slower than a drunken pig (rendering it very easy target for bombers). True, it is powerful - but so is Corvo, having Cruiser Shield.
Reply  
Offline Sabru
02-03-2016, 01:20 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,274
Threads: 262
Joined: Jan 2012

I didnt even realize the pilgrim cargo until i saw this thread and checked FLStat. What was the reason for the increase in cargo size, anyway? i had to go search the patch notes to find the ninja mention.

[Image: 9KgNaeX.png]
Reply  
Offline The Savage
02-03-2016, 01:56 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-03-2016, 02:00 PM by The Savage.)
#3
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

It was actually in announcement, but reasons behind changing 3600 into 4300 does not really make sense, since only handful of factions can use it (and won't really use it having cheaper alternative in form of Pirate Train). Wasn't that ship supposed to be for open use in the first place, when it was moved from Junker Techcell into Sirian Civilian one, then legalized all across the Sirius?

Let's be honest about it - it is more a roleplaying vessel, with itself being worn out and prepared for long sails across the Omicrons, most obviously the best fitting Freelancer ID for scientist RP.
Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
02-03-2016, 02:17 PM,
#4
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

It used to have that big hold long ago and it makes more sense to have this much than 3,6k, same hold size than a Serenity, than which the Pilgrim is three times bigger. It's just that back then prior to the hold nerf we used to have more IDs been merged into the FL ID since, the FL ID also had exceptions on Ptrain or Ptrans and the Pilgrim from the hold limit line of the ID.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline Stoner_Steve
02-03-2016, 02:21 PM,
#5
Master of Arms
Posts: 2,549
Threads: 339
Joined: Jan 2014

we've had this discussion before

The Player Request I submitted to have an exemption added to the Freelancer ID was ignored/denied, join the Junkers, Rogues, or anyone really that isn't a freelancer, lord help us if they have more than 2 ships to pick from at the limit of their cargo requirements.

[Image: O2vt8So.png]
SLRC Faction Document | SLRC Recruitment | SLRC Feedback | SLRC Message Dump
Reply  
Offline SnakeLancerHaven
02-03-2016, 02:21 PM,
#6
Volgograd Industrial
Posts: 2,873
Threads: 238
Joined: Feb 2012

Why did that change? The exception, could it be because of the Civilian Carrier? Allthough it realy would be lovely if FL and Pirate ID would get Pilgrim and PTrain exception, both ways as they're both Sirius Unlawful ships.

[Image: ?key=dc385ef2304f0cab6f94da42bc2ff703cf5...5BS0UucG5n]
R.I.P Tabris...
Youtube - Twitch - My old Account
  Reply  
Offline Thyrzul
02-03-2016, 02:23 PM,
#7
The Council
Posts: 4,684
Threads: 115
Joined: Sep 2011

At least in terms of cargo space the Pilgrim is a more viable option now.

[Image: OFPpYpb.png][Image: N1Zf8K4.png][Image: LnLbhul.png]
Reply  
Offline The Savage
02-03-2016, 02:47 PM,
#8
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

Yes, it does. But then - no one actually would use that ship. Hypotetically: if I was Rogue or Junker and was given choice between Pilgrim and PTrain, I'd go with PTrain because it's more sleek and cheaper - as opposed to fat transport ship without any real purpose except for firepower which doesn't count against two bombers hitting slow and humongous target.
Reply  
Offline The Savage
02-03-2016, 07:15 PM,
#9
Probation
Posts: 1,034
Threads: 60
Joined: Nov 2015

To be closed, since other thread exist out there, which was created yesterday and I've not noticed it.
Reply  


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode