With the bulk of the current RP regarding my main character out of the way I've focused a bit more on the Red Hessian Army's intelligence branch. Updates have been made to the Lore and to the roster (roster updates aren't finished yet but its what I have for now.)
Any concerns regarding SOA can be dropped here as well. I figured I'd bump this since I made a lore edit. But yea, for those of you almost no one who fly in the Omegas expect to see more SOA ships pop up.
Take note, I will update the wiki lore as well ASAP im currently busy with other things as well at the moment.
(10-31-2016, 07:31 AM)DragonLancer Wrote: You had turned RHA into a lolwut freakshow.
Please rename yourself because you are far away from any RHA roleplay - if any.
(10-31-2016, 09:36 AM)DragonLancer Wrote: Watch your words kid.
Can you elaborate on current RHA being "a lolwut freakshow" and "far away from any RHA roleplay"?
We, in Red Hessian Army are always striving to improve our behaviour and roleplay, but it would be hard without any specifics given.
Also, please restrain from personal threats, this's faction feedback, not Riess's
@Zayne Carrick: As you can see I'm a very dedicated player.
Sadly not a diplomat more a worker.
Back in times I've played as RHA and later with RM or my Corsair faction I still good great RP encounters with RHA.
At some point there was a cut.
Admins changed, modders changed, factions changed.
But the recent events regarding RHA made me sad.
In general I've seen too many players who enjoyed the perverted glory to destroy other player's work.
Obviously something is wrong.
Mea culpa for the troubles comrade.
My heart is for the teamplay not for destroying other's work - regardless which faction.
----
(11-15-2016, 03:01 PM)Benoit Wrote: While I must say that everything concerned the Reutlingen siege was legal and logic, and that it is great to see someone like @Wesker to be able to gather such a number of Rheinlander (be it lawful or unlawful), there is still something that bothers me a bit about that siege:
Going after the HQ of a faction that is struggling to stay active may actually harm the server. I know it's completely absurd but for a faction like Kruger (a more than a year old trading faction), having that HQ was the only thing that was attractive for new players to join them. Otherwise, there isn't much else to do for the remaining players in Kruger: once your first billion is reached, what else would you need Kruger if you're not into the trading RP?
Yes, base builders expose themselves to its destruction. But as a community of reasonable people, we should also acknowledge the opposite side of that statement: base destroyers can destroy other factions if they are not careful.
(12-07-2016, 07:09 PM)Wesker Wrote: Zayne's absent, hes HC but hes not the leader. If anyone should know peoples problems with the faction more than him, it's the faction leader.
I'm really not aware of your opinion, I'm taking it into consideration given you feel the need to express it here.
However you aren't elaborating which is why I asked.
Pardon?
Zayne was online just 1 hour ago.
My answer - with quotes even - was directed to him as we had this argue some weeks ago,
with no other intension than to explain to him and our fellow comrades my strange behaviour.
You even contacted me on Skype and I told you in my own way my opinion.
But you never answered.
I considered this done.
Perhaps I should join RHA and get in touch with your new RP as you announced it.
In return I can deliver my experience as old RHA veteran if you like, comrade.
Wesker, it is absolutely bad that you decided to come into this fight just to go against the planned layout of the event.
It was announced and planned as a BAF-Corsair event. It was discussed whether 3-sided pew was wanted. And decided against from the side of the organisers. You were told on TS. You knew it. You were pleaded to, not to bring RHA to ruin it. You were asked to stay out on TS and not intervene. It was also explained why. And still... you did it.
When you found out that it was not posted, and therefore not protected by faction rights, you decided immediately to bring Hessians and do what felt like ruining it for those who actually wanted to have a nice, easy BAF-Sair fight - as planned.
The way you did it, the way you talked, the way you now renamed the channel on TS to "This party's over", the way you came into the TS channel afterwards... it all seems to prove your bad intention. You wanted the event to not take place.
You ruined it for BAF, who was sitting in Omega 3, with no Omega 5 ZoI, while Sairs and Hessians shot each other in O5.
Just answer this:
What is so hard to accept the wish of the event makers?
It is hard enough to get things organised.
And you had to go against it, fully knowing that it would ruin it.
This mentality is really bad.
This mentality ruins the motivation of those who still want to organise things on Disco.
And, you succeeded: it was a bad event. It was a zero fun thing.
The planned event never happened.
We had no BAF-Sair fight, as we planned and wished.
![[Image: P6DLUCr.png?4]](https://i.imgur.com/P6DLUCr.png?4)
![[Image: AX5RcTh.png?4]](https://i.imgur.com/AX5RcTh.png?4)
