(11-07-2017, 08:40 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Where in the game is it a battlecruiser?
Its always been a battlecruiser, only about a year after Toledo was it turned into a carrier. The Overwatch has been trying to get it turned back into a battlecruiser for some months now
I could make all carriers battleships by changing shipclass = 17 to 16/18. Carriers dont have anything special about them. They're just other themed battleships.
(11-07-2017, 08:37 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Removing the Geb as a carrier is also a stupid idea. I fail to see why you are removing one of the few carriers in the game.
To be blunt with you Nom, the Geb was a battlecruiser a few years back. InRP its an assault carrier, but combat wise its a battlecruiser. If you want to put it out there. Its class is a battlecruiser, only inRP is it actually a carrier..its a strange hybrid that needs to be corrected
So basically another Hybrid like the Bustard, but more combat oriented as Carrier-Battlecrusier. Am I right?
(11-07-2017, 08:42 PM)Erzie Wrote: I could make all carriers battleships by changing shipclass = 17 to 16/18. Carriers dont have anything special about them. They're just other themed battleships.
(11-07-2017, 08:40 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: Where in the game is it a battlecruiser?
Are you seriously arguing about this? The ship is obviously a BC, despite the "Carrier" in it's name.
It's price matches that of a battlecruiser. It has BC guns, it has BC hull. How is it not a battlecruiser?
Plus, there's a thing called Light Carriers.
Stop derailing the thread and drop it already. It's about cloaks and JDs, not about a mistake in a ship's name.
(11-07-2017, 08:42 PM)nOmnomnOm Wrote: The patch notes don't mention it - Issue was overlooked with the volume of changes. The game doesn't mention it -it uses BC weapons The FLstat does not mention it -It's class 15 The wiki does not mention it - Irrelevant
Punishing people for using it as a carrier is moronic
