(05-27-2022, 03:09 AM)Megaera Wrote: If you come here to *****, at least don't hide behind an alt.
Other than that, cool story.
Now let me explain to you how nerfed bombers are vs an actual VHF. Snac doesnt instakill anymore and the guns have so much spread that 80% of the projectiles will miss a target that is standing still.
Person in question was very hungry for a blue and decided to attack me. Cool. Then dont be surprised if the people 20k away from it are going to intervene. As soon as said attacker fled, we broke off the attack. Cause we honestly didnt care if we killed it or not.
Also whoever Sally is. If you want to call me out on something, you can do it from your main account and not pull stuff out of context.
Alright?
Believe it or not this isn't an alt, although i can understand why you may think that cause the account was created this month, i'm just someone that has returned to this server after a long break to check around how things are working nowadays.
I do think that being caught in a bomber is somewhat a good excuse to call for some help (i didn't even recall the orchid was a bomber), however i still think one bomber and two snubs vs one is still overkill like Couden mentioned, and the whole encounter could've been handled in different ways, but that's just my two cents. And i also do not know what you mean with "pulling stuff out of context", the video has plenty of context from before the fight, the screenshot was just for fun with no ill intent and i doubt someone would think otherwise, you're taking things too seriously.
(05-27-2022, 03:09 AM)Megaera Wrote: If you come here to *****, at least don't hide behind an alt.
Other than that, cool story.
Now let me explain to you how nerfed bombers are vs an actual VHF. Snac doesnt instakill anymore and the guns have so much spread that 80% of the projectiles will miss a target that is standing still.
Person in question was very hungry for a blue and decided to attack me. Cool. Then dont be surprised if the people 20k away from it are going to intervene. As soon as said attacker fled, we broke off the attack. Cause we honestly didnt care if we killed it or not.
Also whoever Sally is. If you want to call me out on something, you can do it from your main account and not pull stuff out of context.
Alright?
Believe it or not this isn't an alt, although i can understand why you may think that cause the account was created this month, i'm just someone that has returned to this server after a long break to check around how things are working nowadays.
I do think that being caught in a bomber is somewhat a good excuse to call for some help (i didn't even recall the orchid was a bomber), however i still think one bomber and two snubs vs one is still overkill like Couden mentioned, and the whole encounter could've been handled in different ways, but that's just my two cents. And i also do not know what you mean with "pulling stuff out of context", the video has plenty of context from before the fight, the screenshot was just for fun with no ill intent and i doubt someone would think otherwise, you're taking things too seriously.
Well then if it isn't an alt.
You mean to say that you weren't even part of the encounter, only saw a video and came to this feedback thread to complain about something you weren't a part of. I know the person we shot at, and that person isn't you.
So what is the point of this feedback then? Person in question can post here himself if it bothers him so much. Not some random person who wasn't even there and saw some video and felt offended somehow.
Also posting a link with a random quote from discord isn't posting feedback, its just flaming. The discord screenshot you took of my message is from a year ago and i doubt you took it. This means there was alot of salt before you decided to come here and meddle with stuff you have no part in.
Anyway. You made an amazing first impression.
And ofcourse I take things serious. This is a feedback thread, not flood. If you actually have constructive criticism, be my guest. I will explain exactly what happened and why it happened like it did. But you came here to flame me personally, else you wouldnt be posting my discord quote here.
Welcome back to the game, but I hope in your next endeavours you leave your toxicity at home.
Megaera Wrote:Well then if it isn't an alt.
You mean to say that you weren't even part of the encounter, only saw a video and came to this feedback thread to complain about something you weren't a part of. I know the person we shot at, and that person isn't you.
I was the one that recorded that video, i was not directly involved in the encounter but i witnessed it, hence why i posted it. You seem to care too much about who was who oorp and who supposedly said what ooc rather than the fact that some random player saw you gank another random player and just thought there was a lack of sportsmanship on the whole thing, hence why i posted it in feedback.
Megaera Wrote:So what is the point of this feedback then? Person in question can post here himself if it bothers him so much. Not some random person who wasn't even there and saw some video and felt offended somehow.
Where does it say someone must be directly involved or bothered to post in feedback? In fact i'm not even mad or bothered by it and i still wouldn't even if i was the one that got ganked, it's not worth it. The reason i posted is above in my first comment, i saw someone getting ganked by a player faction, i saw there is a feedback, thought it was relevant to post it, that's it.
Megaera Wrote:Also posting a link with a random quote from discord isn't posting feedback, its just flaming. The discord screenshot you took of my message is from a year ago and i doubt you took it. This means there was alot of salt before you decided to come here and meddle with stuff you have no part in.
Anyway. You made an amazing first impression.
Indeed i did not take that screenshot myself, it's something i did find in a Discord server some time ago which this encounter reminded me of, and i thought it was on point to post it here now even if jokingly, considering you're in charge and responsible of this faction, my apologies if it triggered in some way, the feedback is still genuine regardless of that.
Megaera Wrote:And ofcourse I take things serious. This is a feedback thread, not flood. If you actually have constructive criticism, be my guest. I will explain exactly what happened and why it happened like it did. But you came here to flame me personally, else you wouldnt be posting my discord quote here.
It's a feedback thread about a faction from a game that is twenty years old and you somewhat seem bothered for a screenshot of something you said and even claim i'm "flaming" by just posting it, i would say that's taking it too seriously. And do not worry, i don't think there's nothing further to clarify, you were caught by someone using a snub in a bomber, decided you were at a disadvantage and got help from other two snubs to take it down.
Megaera Wrote:Welcome back to the game, but I hope in your next endeavours you leave your toxicity at home.
Megaera Wrote:Well then if it isn't an alt.
You mean to say that you weren't even part of the encounter, only saw a video and came to this feedback thread to complain about something you weren't a part of. I know the person we shot at, and that person isn't you.
I was the one that recorded that video, i was not directly involved in the encounter but i witnessed it, hence why i posted it. You seem to care too much about who was who oorp and who supposedly said what ooc rather than the fact that some random player saw you gank another random player and just thought there was a lack of sportsmanship on the whole thing, hence why i posted it in feedback.
Megaera Wrote:So what is the point of this feedback then? Person in question can post here himself if it bothers him so much. Not some random person who wasn't even there and saw some video and felt offended somehow.
Where does it say someone must be directly involved or bothered to post in feedback? In fact i'm not even mad or bothered by it and i still wouldn't even if i was the one that got ganked, it's not worth it. The reason i posted is above in my first comment, i saw someone getting ganked by a player faction, i saw there is a feedback, thought it was relevant to post it, that's it.
Megaera Wrote:Also posting a link with a random quote from discord isn't posting feedback, its just flaming. The discord screenshot you took of my message is from a year ago and i doubt you took it. This means there was alot of salt before you decided to come here and meddle with stuff you have no part in.
Anyway. You made an amazing first impression.
Indeed i did not take that screenshot myself, it's something i did find in a Discord server some time ago which this encounter reminded me of, and i thought it was on point to post it here now even if jokingly, considering you're in charge and responsible of this faction, my apologies if it triggered in some way, the feedback is still genuine regardless of that.
Megaera Wrote:And ofcourse I take things serious. This is a feedback thread, not flood. If you actually have constructive criticism, be my guest. I will explain exactly what happened and why it happened like it did. But you came here to flame me personally, else you wouldnt be posting my discord quote here.
It's a feedback thread about a faction from a game that is twenty years old and you somewhat seem bothered for a screenshot of something you said and even claim i'm "flaming" by just posting it, i would say that's taking it too seriously. And do not worry, i don't think there's nothing further to clarify, you were caught by someone using a snub in a bomber, decided you were at a disadvantage and got help from other two snubs to take it down.
Megaera Wrote:Welcome back to the game, but I hope in your next endeavours you leave your toxicity at home.
Thank you, and likewise.
Those are alot of assumptions you are making on both sides. Both at how I deal with situations and how the other party experienced something. I don't care about who is who, but I happened to know who I was facing. Would that make me treat him any different? Not at all. I just know that you are not the person who was involved with the encounter. Just a spectator.
The player who flew Yuzu does not need for you to white knight him. He isn't a child and can speak for himself in the same way I speak for myself. It is a lack of respect towards him if you feel like you know better than either of us how he experienced the encounter. The person flying Yuzu is someone I will talk to about this personally if he feels wronged in any way, as I respect him higher than to talk about him with a random third person who happened to watch from the sideline.
Ganks are completely subjective. There is never a completely fair fight as that requires both people to be of equal level and under controlled settings. In short, you would have stay in conn as there is always someone better than you and things happen that are out of your control. He disrupted something and got chased off. Simple as that. If I had to complain every time I was subject to pvp where I was overwhelmed completely by multiple enemies, I would have over a hundred feedback posts already. Its part of the game that sometimes you bite off more than you can chew and sometimes people throw more at a person than was warranted. In this case the word gank is greatly exaggerated.
Next time I am on my VHF and can fight another VHF on equal terms, he will get a duel like the other 50 times I fought that guy. This time the situation was just different. The person I was RPing with specifically requested for another one of my characters. I was on a VHF and switched to a nearby bomber to continue the conversation (said character doesnt fly fighters other than a LF that was at Malta). Yuzu showed up and wanted to hunt me down. Like I said, the other fighters only showed up to chase it away, not kill it.
You are free to post in this thread any time you like. It doesn't trigger me one bit. I just find it arrogant and disrespectful when you believe that you know better how another person experienced the encounter.
Hi.
Not a fan of forum stuff, usually.
I just made a new char, hoped to play some hardliner Samura. Indoctrinated by corporate policies and like.
Not sure why your .. I think 1ic? .. decided to planetdive pretty much in front of me, like 3-4k distance, when fleeing. That fleeing part is ok. I get it. Hope that is a one time thing, made me sad. :c
Lag and framerate drop does that to you.
Note how the 'loot' isn't anywhere near the atmosphere. One frame I was flying to the lane, the other frame I had the planet right infront of my screen.
My internet took like 20min to recover (or whatever that caused it).
Next time hopefully you will have a better experience.
I just wanted to comment on recent behavior by GCs that I believe is not in line with Official Faction standards. I try to avoid complaining regarding such things, but I believe you have crossed a line here.
I'll refrain from replying to your arguments in case you decide to deflect.
1iC, better known as Megaera, suggests, corporations shouldn't dock in the presence of GC-ships. This is merely hypocritical. Your factions have taught their members to avoid interacting with the House authorities if the odds aren't in their favor.
Nowadays,
- you hug the POB in Shikoku with unlimited weapon platforms and "RolePlay" back as if you're tough,
- you ram planets (as you did today); what is more disappointing, is that your 1iC (Megaera) rammed the planet and ignored all of my DMs.
- you bully defenceless transports in large numbers,
- you run away (by logging off, ramming planets and whatnot) as soon as there is someone who can possibly be a threat to your activities.
Having said that, I want to ask why the Official Faction standards nowadays are so poor, and why players can get away with such bold violations so easily?
Planet Ramming Wrote:[12.07.2022 19:24:10] KSP Ship: Konnichiwa.
[12.07.2022 19:24:32] KSP Ship: Cut your engines down, Chrysanthemum. We can do this the easier way.
[12.07.2022 19:25:17] KSP Ship: You don't really need to run as soon as you see someone who can stop your illegal activities.
[12.07.2022 19:25:47] GC-Yunoki.Misaki: Hmm
[12.07.2022 19:25:59] KSP Ship: Looks like I caught you.
[12.07.2022 19:26:03] Death: GC-Yunoki.Misaki suffered a self-inflicted catastrophic decompression.
[12.07.2022 19:26:07] /time
Posts: 2,898
Threads: 165
Joined: Nov 2008
Staff roles: Moderator
(07-12-2022, 08:52 PM)xenomorph Wrote: tl;dr
I'm new around here, but I can promise you, next time I shall sit still and grant you a free blue. I gotchu mate. Although, you flew right past me and decided to chase the ship that was obviously leaving. This actions makes me think Meg has a special place in your heart. I was, after all, a valid target that was right in your CD's range. I feel genuinely discriminated by your actions.
There was two of you camping the Jumpgate from New Tokyo to Shikoku.
As soon as you saw me, both of you ran away in different directions.
I chased the ship closest to me.
Please, I would appreciate it if you would avoid ridiculing people who give feedback.
Please keep in mind your 1iC ridiculted Samura| for docking in presence of GC-, and your members made fun of |KSP| for "Low PvP Skill."
And quite frankly, |KSP| is a whole lot more representative than this Official Faction. And, I respect them for actually fighting and not avoiding to get killed.
I just wanted to comment on recent behavior by GCs that I believe is not in line with Official Faction standards. I try to avoid complaining regarding such things, but I believe you have crossed a line here.
I'll refrain from replying to your arguments in case you decide to deflect.
1iC, better known as Megaera, suggests, corporations shouldn't dock in the presence of GC-ships. This is merely hypocritical. Your factions have taught their members to avoid interacting with the House authorities if the odds aren't in their favor.
Nowadays,
- you hug the POB in Shikoku with unlimited weapon platforms and "RolePlay" back as if you're tough,
- you ram planets (as you did today); what is more disappointing, is that your 1iC (Megaera) rammed the planet and ignored all of my DMs.
- you bully defenceless transports in large numbers,
- you run away (by logging off, ramming planets and whatnot) as soon as there is someone who can possibly be a threat to your activities.
Having said that, I want to ask why the Official Faction standards nowadays are so poor, and why players can get away with such bold violations so easily?
Planet Ramming Wrote:[12.07.2022 19:24:10] KSP Ship: Konnichiwa.
[12.07.2022 19:24:32] KSP Ship: Cut your engines down, Chrysanthemum. We can do this the easier way.
[12.07.2022 19:25:17] KSP Ship: You don't really need to run as soon as you see someone who can stop your illegal activities.
[12.07.2022 19:25:47] GC-Yunoki.Misaki: Hmm
[12.07.2022 19:25:59] KSP Ship: Looks like I caught you.
[12.07.2022 19:26:03] Death: GC-Yunoki.Misaki suffered a self-inflicted catastrophic decompression.
[12.07.2022 19:26:07] /time
Good know know you know exactly who I was. I figured as much, seeing how you completely ignored everyone else who was there to go after the waran that had no weapons to defend against your fighter. But guess the blues are more important. It proved enough that you logged off right after I did and ignored every single one of the other GC you could have engaged.
That 'pob' you speak of is a GC NPC station that is inRP hidden. Nice that you came to visit us there. Couldve called you all out for metagaming which wouldve been factually correct. Instead we filed it under just another cringe moment and decided not to bother with it and just log off. We were still gathering a proper group to counter the 4 snubs coming for us and we wanted to give you a proper 4 vs 4. But seeing how all of you were base camping, it kinda killed the mood.
Bullying transports in large numbers... Normally we just RP with them and alot of them get away without even paying us anything. Last time I even played some dice game with a bunch of miners.
Give me something concrete please.