• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Developers Forum Discovery Unofficial Development Discovery Mod Content Submissions
« Previous 1 … 24 25 26 27 28
Harvester

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (11): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 11 Next »
Harvester
Offline Zapp
07-23-2008, 11:41 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 4,978
Threads: 267
Joined: Sep 2007

The LWB have a Rheinland Pirate Cruiser as their flagship (I just bought the Cap VII for it today >.>), don't replace it, just add, OK?

[Image: u8rHEaq.png]
Reply  
Offline Jinx
07-23-2008, 11:49 PM, (This post was last modified: 07-23-2008, 11:50 PM by Jinx.)
#12
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

here are the pro and cons about replace / adding:

replace : chances are good to get it into the game ... however, it will mess with non-harvesters RP - especially as that ship is special and cannot be used by a "common" pirate.

addition : i can meddle with "interesting effects" such as custom sound effects ( like the marsflier ) and non-engine grapics - instead a glow or a pulsating light. - however, chances are small to have it completely added, especially as it benefits only a minority of people.

my other idea was to replace one of the battlestars with it ( i have scrapped the talarca and the liner models - the talarca is needed in its current shape cause its neutral - the liner was rubbish ) - but i think the =CR= wants the battlestars in the game... so i cannot replace them either.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
07-23-2008, 11:53 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

What about the Huntress?

Already sold in the right place.

No one uses it.

It's rubbish (due to current size/shape etc. Not for any reason I know if which would impact this vessel).

It's an import.

This would be a huge improvement upon that vessel.
Reply  
Offline ScornStar
07-24-2008, 12:00 AM, (This post was last modified: 07-24-2008, 12:10 AM by ScornStar.)
#14
Member
Posts: 1,128
Threads: 69
Joined: Jan 2008

I would agree with Dusty but if we replace that means it assumes the stats of the Huntress, which would have very strage turret placement compaired to this ship shape.



' Wrote:The LWB have a Rheinland Pirate Cruiser as their flagship (I just bought the Cap VII for it today >.>), don't replace it, just add, OK?

Could the LWB lobby for a Hessien criuser? School me, if not. I pay for it for ya Zapp. Beside you have 1,234,568,778,990,876,543 active RPs and 2 factions going right now, but if thats not a possible option then lets think of one.

Eat Babies!!!!!!!!!!
Join our cause for a baby free world.
Harvester diplomacy
[Image: Harvester00acopy.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
07-24-2008, 12:00 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

' Wrote:I would agree with Dusty but if we replace that means it assumes the stats of the Huntress, which would have very strage turret placement compaired to this ship shape.

Turret placement and such can be changed. Hardpoints can be moved or added to, but not detracted from.
Reply  
Offline ScornStar
07-24-2008, 12:02 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 1,128
Threads: 69
Joined: Jan 2008

' Wrote:Turret placement and such can be changed. Hardpoints can be moved or added to, but not detracted from.

Cool I really dont want 12 turrets on this thing 9 is fine.

Eat Babies!!!!!!!!!!
Join our cause for a baby free world.
Harvester diplomacy
[Image: Harvester00acopy.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Walker
07-24-2008, 12:03 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 965
Threads: 72
Joined: Apr 2008

If the Pirate Cruiser is a Star-Destroyer... I am so flying one...

*points to sig*

Hey wait a minute; How the heck do we manage to get ALMOST all Star Wars ships... But only ONE Star-Destroyer!?

Anywho... That Ship looks nice; It reminds me of the Bret Battleship a Little but it would work nicely... Heil Harvester 00!

Tiberius Walker, putting flames out and being awesome since Apr 13 2008 ™
[8/17/2008 5:56:46 PM] Aaron (Boss/Jurgen) says: Can't bring myself to say it... Looks like you get the LABC, I've seen what you can do in one
Walker (Albert Wint): I can has win? --- Epyon the Bored: You can haz win. --- [1:18:00 PM] Chris (Niezck) says: I love you <3
[5:55:53 PM] Raisu says: Walker pwned both Battleships(LNS-Texas LNS-Arizona) - [5:55:57 PM] Raisu says: in a cruiser
Tiberius Walker, spreading mayhem, destruction, and Spamming Flood since Oct 22 2008 ™
[9:08:25 AM] Gurjiv (Frozen) says: I hope someone gives you AIDs.
[7:15:17 PM] Dylan (Ximen) says: Walker... you have no idea how much fail you bring into this world...
[8:05:08 AM] Ross (SevereTrinity) says: Screw you for making me install FL again
[10:51Big GrinIE AM] Epyon the Bored says: My god if I ever meet you I am going to strangle you.
Tiberius Walker, being better then you since April 30, 2009 ™
We will remember - We do not Forget - We do not Forgive
  Reply  
Offline Dusty Lens
07-24-2008, 12:05 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 6,664
Threads: 438
Joined: Dec 2007

Thankfully firing archs could be adjusted to compensate for that!

Much like Jinx has opted to do with the BHGunship, causing only four turrets to fire forward.
Reply  
Offline sovereign
07-24-2008, 12:14 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 3,893
Threads: 38
Joined: Feb 2008

I will be happy when I see a fighter to go along with. Nice model, but if there is the beautiful cap and no fitting fighter there will be even more cruisers than before. I don't like the sound of that.

[Image: SCRAgenderheuristics.png]
  Reply  
Offline ScornStar
07-24-2008, 12:20 AM, (This post was last modified: 07-24-2008, 12:22 AM by ScornStar.)
#20
Member
Posts: 1,128
Threads: 69
Joined: Jan 2008

We are a NPC farming, cap faction. Its the way we are is there something wrong with RPing that?

Fighter are not cost effective. This battered horse needs not another beating. Besides our main fighter is the Kith Som Taaw SHF we have had this discussion often. This is supposed to be an evolution of our higher intellects. We dont spend time on failed models. 30 million = 1 equiped fighter. Easily killed = no harvest to take home = dead Harvesters.

1 cap cost 110 mil = fewer deaths and more profit.

We spend more to make more and keep more.

Any more then PM me and we can scype. (does anyone have a working mic?) every one type chats lets talk.

Eat Babies!!!!!!!!!!
Join our cause for a baby free world.
Harvester diplomacy
[Image: Harvester00acopy.jpg]
  Reply  
Pages (11): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 … 11 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode