• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 451 452 453 454 455 546 Next »
Paladin Bretonian Imperial Fighter

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Paladin Bretonian Imperial Fighter
Offline Telbasta
08-04-2008, 03:21 AM,
#21
Member
Posts: 282
Threads: 28
Joined: Jul 2008

I'm not sure about the model, it does look too starwars-like IMO.

However as to the name and description you gave it... no.

Bretonia is not an empire, it's a matriarchy/monarchy. You can call it a royal fighter, but not an imperial fighter. Likewise, bretonia doesnt have "house lords" - that's a system used in japanese (aka kusari) history, not english (bretonian).


[Image: 1e1j07.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Xing
08-04-2008, 03:26 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2008, 03:28 AM by Xing.)
#22
Member
Posts: 5,274
Threads: 147
Joined: Oct 2007

All the "infocard" I write are never official by the way. I dont really frequent bretonia, so I know about nothing of that place.

As to model, thats called implementing stuffs from other series to fit in Freelancer without everyone screaming import.

Geez, people are yelling over imports, now we cant even submit ships based on imports? Its body is fully bretonian, you dont see solar pannels on the side or an imperial octogonal cockpit... and imperial, because even in SP they called Bretonia, "The Bretonian Empire" (trent and junko goes to FP1; response of the battleship)

[Image: audrey03a.png]
  Reply  
Offline Boss
08-04-2008, 03:30 AM,
#23
Member
Posts: 5,125
Threads: 101
Joined: Jan 2008

Hey, I like it...

Zealot Wrote:Just go play the game and have fun dammit.
Treewyrm Wrote:all in all the conclusion is that disco doesn't need antagonist factions, it doesn't need phantoms, it doesn't need nomads, it doesn't need coalition and it doesn't need many other things, no AIs, the game is hijacked by morons to confuse the game with their dickwaving generic competition games mixed up with troll-of-the-day.
Reply  
Offline Telbasta
08-04-2008, 03:35 AM,
#24
Member
Posts: 282
Threads: 28
Joined: Jul 2008

I didnt say I didnt like the model, I'm just not sure it fits entirely.

It does look good... though my suggestion would be to remove the current engines on it, and put them on the backs of the 'wings/panels' to give it a racier look.

I'd probably fly one of these if it were added, as long as it didnt say imperial =P

[Image: 1e1j07.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline bluntpencil2001
08-04-2008, 10:20 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2008, 10:20 AM by bluntpencil2001.)
#25
Member
Posts: 5,088
Threads: 66
Joined: May 2007

' Wrote:I'm not sure about the model, it does look too starwars-like IMO.

However as to the name and description you gave it... no.

Bretonia is not an empire, it's a matriarchy/monarchy. You can call it a royal fighter, but not an imperial fighter. Likewise, bretonia doesnt have "house lords" - that's a system used in japanese (aka kusari) history, not english (bretonian).

Correction.

Bretonia appears to be based upon Victorian-period Britain, which was an Empire. British, and I'm assuming Bretonian, monarchs tend to have heaps of titles aside from 'the Queen'. Queen Victoria herself was the Empress of India, for example.

Also, Xing rawks.

[Image: sig-9566.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
08-04-2008, 10:23 AM,
#26
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

the model itself looks very good - i like the texturing in particular. - i don t care much for its similarities to a tie fighter ( mind, i don t think it looks too much alike anyway - a tie fighter is build around a basic concept - a sphere, 2 hexagon shaped solar panels and thats it - simplistic to the max. ... this ship is ornamented much more )



i can imagine it to have near hammerhead stats ( less agility / turn rate - but more armour and power as it looks bulkier than a hammerhead ) - an excellent ship and very bretonian-ish.


[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Stoat
08-04-2008, 11:03 AM, (This post was last modified: 08-04-2008, 11:03 AM by Stoat.)
#27
Member
Posts: 2,133
Threads: 90
Joined: Aug 2007

That ship is fantastic. Ignore the remarks about it looking too much like a TIE fighter. While we can see the influence, that is definately a Bret ship, not an SW import.

Bretonia really needs an HF. Something not too heavy, and very manouverable, to fill the gap between the uber nippy Hussar and the very heavy Templar and Challenger.

Can we see a comparison between the Hammerhead and this one? My instant thought on seeing what Jinx suggested was that it should be more manouverable but less armoured. Would be nice to see the models side by side to compare.

[Image: Sig3.png]
My Stories
Reply  
Offline Stratus
08-04-2008, 11:09 AM,
#28
Member
Posts: 121
Threads: 0
Joined: Mar 2007

Ohh that looks wonderful, couldn't have picked a better name myself..

[Image: u3cld.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
08-04-2008, 11:15 AM,
#29
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

@staot:



i think more manouverable and less armoured is not really possible much. - the hammerhead is very manouverable but fairly lightly armoured already - and it looks frailer than this ship. ( i think eagle agility but a better response to turning, 8k and something armour )



anyway - it gotto be worse anyway - cause the hammerhead has improved stats, cause its a vanilla ship - as a custom ship, it would rather get virage stats, i guess. ( or stinger ) - and if not classified a VHF ( virage has 9600 armour i think ) - but a HF, it would prolly have something around 7k armour only anyway to make up for the invulnerability against explosives.


[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Stoat
08-04-2008, 11:21 AM,
#30
Member
Posts: 2,133
Threads: 90
Joined: Aug 2007

Ahh, that sounds fair then. Haven't flown the Hammerhead myself so I'll bow down to your superior knowledge. :D

........just please don't make it another tank.

....pretty please


[Image: Sig3.png]
My Stories
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode