the model itself is straight forward. - its quite clean with little to no real surprises, nither negative ones nor positive ones - but its a rather conservative design - doesn t show .... "the artists stroke" or something.
well thats just subjective anyway - all in all, the model is good - there are a few minor things to critizise ... there always are, on every model:
the engines are not very BW like. they appear exposed and without shielding - not like it matters much - but i think BW ships tend to have a seamless chassis around the whole ship.
the bridge appears to be the only "inhabitable" place. - the size is a bit strange - its too flat to suggests it got more than one layer of windows in its main body - all in all it missed a bit - bulkiness.
from this shape to a flying saucer - its not far - just gotto make the upside view a bit more roundish. maybe you can add something more tubelike in the middleaxis.
the current destroyer does not feel like its a saucer, cause its not box shaped too much - but diamond shaped from the front. ( yours : |===| ..... the current one <===> )
whats the reason to stick to the flatness btw? - you went away from the zeppelin shape of the dreadnought quite well on your dread design. - wouldn t it be appropriate to do the same with the destroyer? - its a new replace model - no need to stick too close to it - cause this flatness contradicts your other outcast ships - i think. it "wants" to look in line - but fails ( by inches ) - if it had not got the bridge and the section behind the bridge - it wouldn t look like your other capships.
there is a tube inside your model - so why is it wide anyway - when all the other ships are tubes. even the gunboat is a tube ( 3 tubes ) - but never looks like its flat and wide. maybe a bold step away from the homeworld design might do the trick - and the ID card needs to change anyway - cause no matter what - it doesn t look remotely like a sleeper ship anymore.
' Wrote:1. Get rid of those damned gundamns in your signature.
For the love of God, /signed
I actually like the flatness and general shape... Overall, the ship makes me think 'corvette'. Might stand to have a bit more of a bulge in the middle.
I've been trying to Outcastify, if you will, the Hiigaran Battlecruiser. This is a thin ship; it was meant to be that way. This is sort of an attempt by me to emulate the Hiigaran ship while making something recognizably Outcast out of it. I want to preserve the very well-thought-of combat characteristics of the current Dessie while making it look better; I've also been trying to break away from the tube design. I might have a go at expanding the lower hull into something wider, though, it shouldn't expand the hitbox too much.
Quote:Quick comment - we thought that Panzer was the Leader, Swift. -Agmen
![[Image: LibreIISuper_Small.png]](http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y287/Adelphus/LibreIISuper_Small.png)
![[Image: harlequincopy.png]](http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb305/Dlunar/harlequincopy.png)
![[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]](https://img00.deviantart.net/ca73/i/2013/123/e/a/just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png)
![[Image: CORONAcopy-2.png]](http://i659.photobucket.com/albums/uu311/Rhys_Dallows/CORONAcopy-2.png)
![[Image: SethSig.png]](http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p272/Sedrander/SethSig.png)
![[Image: 1232590676.png]](http://pichosting.files.evil-alex.eu/1232590676.png)
![[Image: chris.png]](http://ishigure.de/signaturen/chris.png)
![[Image: audrey03a.png]](http://img714.imageshack.us/img714/7610/audrey03a.png)