• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 385 386 387 388 389 … 546 Next »
revised model

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »
revised model
Offline Jinx
06-27-2009, 12:02 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-27-2009, 12:03 AM by Jinx.)
#1
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

[Image: revisedorderlightcarrier.png]
to make it quick - i m thinking of increasing the quality of some of my models for future upcoming chances to replace them. - the general "feeling" of the model is supposed to stay - and its not really many models that i think need an update...

but the order light carrier might. - today ( while waiting at fp11 ) i had the chance to inspect a carrier quite closely - and i didn t really like the "trunk" plating. - so this is a suggestion for a revised model.

more detailed, more ornamented - a little better proportioned - and all in all a cleaner model.

*this time - it d also come with an osiris engine instead of 3 smaller bretonian ones.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Turkish
06-27-2009, 12:25 AM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,617
Threads: 50
Joined: Aug 2007

Excellent, an improvement on an already great design.

[Image: LibreIISuper_Small.png]

I have a fetish for all things Norse.
  Reply  
Offline Shagohad
06-27-2009, 12:26 AM,
#3
Member
Posts: 2,055
Threads: 145
Joined: Jul 2007

The original carrier looked very elephantish. This is a good revision with an actual Order feel.


What other models do you plan on cleaning up?

[Image: Tyrael.gif]
"THE HULL HAS BEEN BREACHED AND THE SCIENCE IS LEAKING OUT!"
Reply  
Offline Tenacity
06-27-2009, 12:52 AM,
#4
Member
Posts: 9,496
Threads: 635
Joined: Apr 2008

I like this jinx, it looks a little shorter even, which would do quite a bit for it's combat ability... right now the thing is longer than an osiris.

One of the things that bugs me most about the current model is the fact that the 'bridge' (the trashcan like structure near the middle) is so short that it cannot see over the armored 'trunk' of the ship... it's kinda pointless having windows on the bridge when you cant see where you're going due to obstructions.

It seems like you've fixed that problem with this model, and I like the idea of having the larger engine instead of three smaller ones as well.

As long as the ship stats dont change, I'm all for the model being revised, this new one looks much better.

[Image: Tenacity.gif]
Reply  
Offline reavengitair
06-27-2009, 12:58 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 3,399
Threads: 108
Joined: Dec 2008

holy ****

AWESOME!!!!!!!!!

Really. Awesome.

I look forward to flying this around.
  Reply  
Offline n00bl3t
06-27-2009, 10:07 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 7,448
Threads: 108
Joined: Mar 2008

Can you fly it around in-game Jinx and take some SS?

[Image: hG0lGaj.png]
Anything I say is not intended as offensive, and to try and deliberately misinterpret it as such would be an attempt at trolling via misrepresentation.

It's not a conspiracy, it's localised bias. They're not intelligent enough to form a conspiracy.
Reply  
Offline Jinx
06-27-2009, 10:20 AM,
#7
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

no - not yet - this is a rather complex model of a considerably higher quality than some other ships - it ll take some time to texture it appropriately ( no need to rush ).

other ships i like to revise:

- BHG battlecruiser ( i m not at all too happy with how it turned out - and somehow its too different to the "hunchbacked" rest of the line )

- mastodon - cause it was mentioned that it has bugs

- bretonian train... ppl weren t too happy with it from the very start

- bretonian container transport .... mostly gonne add more details and clean the model - i have examined the model and it contains tons of polygons that are simply pointless.


but these are all projects for the next update - nothing you guys will see in any short time.

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Offline Petersen
06-27-2009, 10:59 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 108
Threads: 0
Joined: Nov 2008

definately an improvement of the model, the front section with the plating looks a lot better and the point with the osiris engine instead of the bretonian ones really makes sense since it should be a heavily modified osiris ship. great work.
one question: do you plan to change the size of the ship or will that stay same. well i guess it doesnt really matter how the size of the model changes if the hitbox stays the same.
Reply  
Offline ophidian
06-27-2009, 11:05 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,421
Threads: 68
Joined: Jan 2009

I like your designs Jinx but I would love to ask you to focus on base designs if possible.

EDIT: I mean, it would be lovely to see the creativity on new base designs. The carrier remake is also looking more solid. Other one was a bit... fragile.

[Image: rand-back.png]
  Reply  
Offline Jinx
06-27-2009, 11:07 AM, (This post was last modified: 06-27-2009, 11:10 AM by Jinx.)
#10
skipasmiður
Posts: 7,685
Threads: 313
Joined: Sep 2007

hitbox, stats, size is meant to stay the same - the ship is balanced now - there s no point in changing it.

on this model - the front section is slightly bulkier - but the rear section is thinner - but since i m lazy - i had only a tube on the carrier anyway - and this will stay the same.

i ll also keep the turret facing of course. - its really mostly cosmetics.

especially the skinning is meant to be better. - on most of my old models, i just used a general UV mapping. - but i ll try to fit the skins onto the faces better. - and its a good way to improve the mod without adding too much new stuff.

@rand_seith: base design is different. - its modular - and i don t really know what modules we can make use of. - refining modules we have or making completely new stations is easy. - but i don t know how those "parts" are used in the process of system modding, - you ll need a system modder to tell what can and cannot be done.

and then there is the tedious work of replacing every station with new parts - for hundreds of stations and thousands of station parts....

[Image: just_a_signature_by_sjrarj-d63yjsx.png]
Shipdesigns made for DiscoveryGC
Reply  
Pages (4): 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode