• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community The Community Real Life Discussion
« Previous 1 … 117 118 119 120 121 245 Next »
Russia plans missions to Mars and the Moon

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »
Russia plans missions to Mars and the Moon
Offline Dieter Schprokets
03-15-2012, 02:29 AM, (This post was last modified: 03-15-2012, 02:30 AM by Dieter Schprokets.)
#11
Member
Posts: 4,394
Threads: 662
Joined: Jul 2007

I sat down and estimated that Canada's current economy is about 1/2 the size of the USA's in the 1960's, in real terms.

What this implies, is that with today's technology, Canada could quite easily afford an Apollo Program.

That being said, what could the USA accomplish?

The problem with space exploration is political will, and an overly risk-averse culture.

Not money, and not technology.

[Image: siggy.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Luksiboj
03-15-2012, 02:38 AM,
#12
Member
Posts: 76
Threads: 3
Joined: Dec 2010

' Wrote:I'd rather see a centralised Earth space agency push development than any one country. Last thing we need is another global pissing contest over Mars, between the US, China and Russia.

Couldn't agree on this more!!!
I think that is the only way,ESA sounds great hehe!(Altough there is European Space Agency).Only by joining our forces and working together the space exploration and colonization can be achieveable.I hope we will see such centralised space agency soon!

[Image: y3Xpn.png]
  Reply  
Klaus Lange
03-15-2012, 03:04 AM,
#13
Unregistered
 

' Wrote:I'd rather see a centralised Earth space agency push development than any one country. Last thing we need is another global pissing contest over Mars, between the US, China and Russia.

Plus countries tend to be dicks when it comes to sharing and playing nice. It'd be great if there was a unified space council, because then there'd be so many biases tugging at the due process that everyone would be discriminated against equally. Yay for level handed treatment!

EDIT: Also, is it just me, or does that timeline sound like 99% impractical posturing? I'll be amazed if the Russians can put their money where their mouth is.


No, they're not dicks. It's called politics. Cruel but true.


' Wrote:Woops, looks like it just got political. Thanks!
[Image: 281.jpg]
"Keep state secret"
:)


' Wrote:I sat down and estimated that Canada's current economy is about 1/2 the size of the USA's in the 1960's, in real terms.

What this implies, is that with today's technology, Canada could quite easily afford an Apollo Program.

That being said, what could the USA accomplish?

The problem with space exploration is political will, and an overly risk-averse culture.

Not money, and not technology.

Exactly. I think during world-wide economic crisis pace of space exploration shall decrease, taxpayers will want save money for current needs.
Reply  
Offline jammi
03-15-2012, 03:46 AM,
#14
Badger Pilot
Posts: 6,525
Threads: 355
Joined: Aug 2007
Staff roles:
Story Dev
Economy Dev

' Wrote:Exactly. I think during world-wide economic crisis pace of space exploration shall decrease, taxpayers will want save money for current needs.
Thing is, space travel has been on the decline for decades. The economic situation has little to do with the will to take to the stars. The primary reason for the big boom in interest last time was an ideological war between the US and Russia.

Politicians don't like space flight because it costs billions, regardless of the currency, and rarely gives physical pay-outs within a four year time period. Meaning, space flight isn't going to get them re-elected. It's sad, but it's not something the average person identifies strongly with.

"Neat, Candidate X is boosting funding to [local space agency]. He sure has my vote!" May be true for a small niche, but not the majority. Our best hope for viable space travel is private enterprise (ventures with the will and vast pools of capital to develop the technology, such as Virgin Galactic, for example) and countries which... don't have the pressure of regular fair elections, shall we say.

[Image: redon.gif]
[Image: f0D5b.png][Image: O2Zu5.png][Image: IlS2I.png][Image: yNeaK.png][Image: 9zbjr.png][Image: D7RGg.png]
News article library, feedback and content requests.
Reply  
Offline JayDee Kasane
03-15-2012, 05:59 AM,
#15
Member
Posts: 2,023
Threads: 51
Joined: Apr 2011

Get yourself ready for space journey:D
But no. Im sure we will not live so long when space will be opened to humans as elevator...

[Image: 6FadQ6bTk_g.jpg]
Reply  
Offline Vladimir
03-15-2012, 09:20 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 1,597
Threads: 39
Joined: Oct 2009

Quote: Our best hope for viable space travel is private enterprise (ventures with the will and vast pools of capital to develop the technology, such as Virgin Galactic, for example) and countries which... don't have the pressure of regular fair elections, shall we say.

Hahaha no. Our best hope is getting a government system that doesn't give a crap about what the majority wants, because the majority always wants only bread and circuses. That way we can concentrate on fundamental science without worrying about all this talk how impractical it is.


But anyway, i want to believe. Can't sit on the top and think it'll be that way forever. Roskosmos isn't in the best state right now, but things steadily improve. New kosmodrom is surely being built, new rocket is in development for long enough time for sure, and i want those nuclear engine projects and many other great ideas being unburied already.

[Image: 158aufs.jpg]
Reply  
Offline dodike
03-15-2012, 09:25 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 3,799
Threads: 55
Joined: Oct 2009

' Wrote:Hahaha no. Our best hope is getting a government system that doesn't give a crap about what the majority wants, because the majority always wants only bread and circuses. That way we can concentrate on fundamental science without worrying about all this talk how impractical it is.
Why should we be spending money for something impractical? Because it makes space-flight geeks excited?
Reply  
Offline Rodent
03-15-2012, 09:32 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 2,174
Threads: 183
Joined: May 2009

' Wrote:Why should we be spending money for something impractical? Because it makes space-flight geeks excited?

Eh, no one doubts that if we put in the effort to master intra-system space travel, the returns will be quite awesome...

It just takes a lot of initial investment, and by lot, I mean a lot. One country alone probably cannot shoulder the load. A trans-national space service with joint funding might do the trick, then you can start putting people on Mars and the Moon and stuff....
Reply  
Offline SparkyRailgun
03-15-2012, 10:20 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 1,454
Threads: 26
Joined: Jan 2012

' Wrote:Why should we be spending money for something impractical? Because it makes space-flight geeks excited?

Noone wants to realise the sad truth; That we're probably going to die off on this grave of a planet without making our mark on the universe.:P

[Image: TQBpX.png]
Reply  
Offline r3vange
03-15-2012, 10:28 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 2,302
Threads: 113
Joined: May 2010

[color=#FFFFFF]I think it should be a joined venture say JAXA, ESA, NASA and RSA. Even if you look at it, Russia has the means to heavy lift a spaceship big enough to make the flight to Mars even now with for example the Proton rocket which was certified human-grade from day one, as it was planned for the Soviet moonshot. If anyone knows how to launch something into orbit and have it crewed for incredibly long periods of time that's Russia. Nasa could easily provide superior avionics, ESA has a long going program of space habitats and JAXA is amazing in the field of experiments

[Image: r3vange.gif]
Reply  
Pages (6): « Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode