COMM ID:Joe Hernandez, IND TARGET:Darlin' Nicky SUBJECT:<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
Nicky, never in all my days travelling the stars have I seen a solar body so beautiful as your own. Your novas! Delightful... Each hellfire was like a kiss. Maybe I can repay you for such a romantic evening.
Do you mind if I call you Cupcake?
Anyway, I left something for you on Freeport four in Magellan. You will find the barman is looking after a package for you... Be careful, it's delicate, like yourself.
I believe you got things confused a little bit. Please do not worry, I will be most happy to enlighten you. I flirt neither with intellectually inferior cockalorums nor loathsome milksops. And since you are nothing more than a lobotomised cockroach, you are disqualified on both accounts. Your clumsy attempts to appear sophisticated do not impress me. Furthermore, I consider it a personal insult that the bottle of de Jerez from 791 which you had sent me did not contain even a simple nerve-toxin. However, rest assured that the whole package, including your precious postcard, was jettisoned, in accordance with our standard procedures, into space after an initial scan. Now allow me to repay you in kind...
COMM ID:Joe Hernandez, IND TARGET:Darlin' Nicky SUBJECT:<3 <3 <3 <3 <3 <3
Oh dear, I think you misunderstood. I dont poison people, it's a step too far towards being indirect. If I'm honest, my dear, I have very little interest in impressing you. We exist to antagonise one another. I happen to do it by being incredibly wealthy, making more money despite your best efforts. I literally swim in my own arrogance. I hope it makes you want to be sick.
Now, the Lane Hackers' (yourself included) have a strangely contradictory little way of dealing with themselves.
Yadda yadda, we're fighting for an end to corporate injustice, blah blah. Rubbish, you're a bunch of hedonistic, self serving, nerds. The only differences between myself and a Lane Hacker are that I keep my head above water legally, and don't fall into the catagory of nerd.
That said, you really are rather photogenic. Dont see why I shouldn't try my chances.
Once again I feel obliged to fill in gaps in your education. You really flatter yourself by saying that we are much alike. Let me elucidate this matter for you. You are nothing more than a Cyrenaic, an egoistic hedonist seeking to drown his existential sorrows in an never-ending festival of shallow pleasures. Being unable to deal with the senselessness of your empty life you focused your attention on making credits in a futile attempt to achieve something. On the other hand, I am more of an Epicurean. While I deny myself neither physical nor mental pleasures of the world, I do seek the perfection in the equilibrium of both body and mind. As such you could probably call me a practical Aristotelian.
You are also mistaken with regard to our mission. We are not socialists fighting for the greater good of the working class. You should view us more as Nietzscheans aware of their own potential. We do not escape, as probably Fromm would say, from freedom like the countless domesticated slaves that you call your 'employees'. While they sell their free will in exchange for a safety granted by predetermined social roles, we are not afraid to shake off the shackles of a repressive society in order to fulfil our potential. We have no illusions. There will always be more slaves than masters. However, we can always strive to awake those lions hidden amongst the lambs.
But I doubt that your limited brain capabilities will allow you to comprehend even minute part of what I have said here.
COMM ID:Joe Hernandez, IND TARGET:Cupcake SUBJECT:Wearing the philosophy hat?
I wasn't implying you were socialists, Cupcake, but rather that the rhetoric you use in a desperate effort at bringing some legitimacy to your actions in other people's eyes is essentially heap of empty waffle almost as irrelevant as the one you just presented to me. If you actually held to some principles, I'd be able to regard you as better than myself.
Gotta say I find it interesting you choose to drag Nietzsche into the whole thing, I mean, for starters the poor man's lost a lot of weight recently. Rugged self belief and a little sprinkling of misogynistic rambling never went too far astray. Now if that'd come from my mouth, I wouldn't be surprised, but frankly, Cupcake, you ain't got the required physiology.
I'd suggest you focus a little more on the 'I' and less on the 'we' if you want to start flailing Nietzsche ineffectually around. "View us"... I'll view you as Nietzsche's herd and rabble, if you carry on with your 'us' and 'we'. But maybe escaping the Jungian collective is impossible even for those who go running around masking it with apparently individualistic philosophical bull, when applied to an entire group and spoken on behalf of others. So maybe the Ubercupcake-lion is lacking a little in terms of teeth, without her "we".
I was completely right not to expect you to understand what I have said. Expressions like 'empty waffle' or 'misogynistic rumbling' fail to mask your ignorance and incapability to comprehend the subtleties of my reasoning. Neither did I expect you to have heard that even Stirner's anarcho-individualists allowed coalitions of goals. However, I am done with the futile attempts to educate you. Time for words has come to an end. Let us hope that we can meet soon and resolve our differences in an old fashioned way.