• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 318 319 320 321 322 … 778 Next »
SRP discussion!

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (19): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 19 Next »
SRP discussion!
Offline Zapp
06-16-2011, 12:17 AM,
#71
Member
Posts: 4,978
Threads: 267
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:Correct me if I am wrong, since idk if you still got Tundra Zapp, or if it was inactive deleted.
I gave it to the Keeper leadership, I dunno what they do with it, if anything. I noticed that the change in SRP ownership was noticed in the SRP archive thread.

Also, the LPI-Leavenworth is another SRP ships, a LPI battleship. Still floating, AFAIK.

[Image: u8rHEaq.png]
Reply  
Offline Kontrazec (Somni)
06-16-2011, 12:21 AM,
#72
Gaian Ninja
Posts: 481
Threads: 60
Joined: Jun 2008

@Athenian:

No problem, honest mistake.

@Zapp:

You have a lot of experience with SRP, right? Do tell, how many epic or memorable moments have you had with the Tundra? How much awesome RP? Is it something we want the community to miss out on?

P.S. Thanks everyone for not trolling and flaming, don't wanna get this topic locked cause of it.

Sucks to be a weight on the wrong side of the brilliance-insanity scale.
Reply  
Offline Jeremy Hunter
06-16-2011, 12:23 AM,
#73
Member
Posts: 6,094
Threads: 200
Joined: Jul 2009

' Wrote:I gave it to the Keeper leadership, I dunno what they do with it, if anything. I noticed that the change in SRP ownership was noticed in the SRP archive thread.

Also, the LPI-Leavenworth is another SRP ships, a LPI battleship. Still floating, AFAIK.


Forgot about that!

And the Tyrannic, the LSFowned dreas too...if that didnt follow its predecessor.

And the SCRA Osirises Q_Q

List:
ThunderBay
Maelstrom
Havana
Karl Marx
Leavenworth
Tyrannic
Tundra


Out of how many SRPs?

Ye...Joker has a point.

[Image: jeremy10.png]
May you ever walk in the Light, Shizune.
Reply  
Offline Athenian
06-16-2011, 12:28 AM,
#74
Member
Posts: 3,615
Threads: 363
Joined: Nov 2007

So if for an experiment, on a trial basis, anyone could fly what they wanted for, say, a month, how would folks feel? Would it make much or any difference?

(edit: I recall changing the Tundra's ownership as well, but tbh I always thought it was a keepers ship)




Former member of "the most paranoid group of people in the community"
Discovery Community Forum Rules

  Reply  
Offline Zapp
06-16-2011, 12:29 AM,
#75
Member
Posts: 4,978
Threads: 267
Joined: Sep 2007

Most of my memories on the Tundra include sitting 50k above plane RPing while Omicron Delta boiled over like a kicked anthill, or having fleets (plural) chasing me trying to kill me. There were some good encounters, such as the RP I did with Ophidian and a few other people who wanted to RP, but the thing was that most of them just wanted to become infected and piggy-back off the Tundra into Nom-dom. And I will say, the only reason that SRP got approved (at least from what I've heard) is that Yuri supported it. As I recall, the admins were loathe to approve it because it would set a standard that you could SRP into Nom-dom, something they didn't want to deal with even then. And that was at the beginning of the SRP process.

EDIT: Ninja'd be Ath, technically not, however I always played by their rules and was an unofficial member for it, so it wasn't a big difference. Thing even had a Keeper ID, not a Special Ops ID (it was before they existed).

[Image: u8rHEaq.png]
Reply  
Offline Zelot
06-16-2011, 12:31 AM,
#76
Member
Posts: 7,539
Threads: 379
Joined: Jun 2007

' Wrote:So if for an experiment, on a trial basis, anyone could fly what they wanted for, say, a month, how would folks feel? Would it make much or any difference?

(edit: I recall changing the Tundra's ownership as well, but tbh I always thought it was a keepers ship)

4.83 woot -.-

[Image: 13121_s.gif]  
Reply  
Offline Kontrazec (Somni)
06-16-2011, 12:32 AM,
#77
Gaian Ninja
Posts: 481
Threads: 60
Joined: Jun 2008

' Wrote:So if for an experiment, on a trial basis, anyone could fly what they wanted for, say, a month, how would folks feel? Would it make much or any difference?

(edit: I recall changing the Tundra's ownership as well, but tbh I always thought it was a keepers ship)

[font=Agency FB]I'm not sure what you mean by that? If you mean just letting everyone ignore tech chart, it would make very much difference, yes, and too much even. The month would be a ripe chaos, with the mentioned kraken titans rampaging all over the place... I say if you'd make a trial period of a month using the player council method, you got nothing to lose, at all. I understand it's a bit iffy to put down something like that in the hands of players, but it's a necessary evil in order for Admins to not get another buttload of work on their hands.

EDIT: Also, a much healthier alternative than never having SRP again. :S

Sucks to be a weight on the wrong side of the brilliance-insanity scale.
Reply  
Offline Omicron
06-16-2011, 12:34 AM,
#78
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

All-white tech chart would fix everyone's problem.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Jeremy Hunter
06-16-2011, 12:35 AM,
#79
Member
Posts: 6,094
Threads: 200
Joined: Jul 2009

' Wrote:[font=Agency FB]I'm not sure what you mean by that? If you mean just letting everyone ignore tech chart, it would make very much difference, yes, and too much even. The month would be a ripe chaos, with the mentioned kraken titans rampaging all over the place... I say if you'd make a trial period of a month using the player council method, you got nothing to lose, at all. I understand it's a bit iffy to put down something like that in the hands of players, but it's a necessary evil in order for Admins to not get another buttload of work on their hands.

I second this.


[Image: jeremy10.png]
May you ever walk in the Light, Shizune.
Reply  
Offline Kontrazec (Somni)
06-16-2011, 12:38 AM,
#80
Gaian Ninja
Posts: 481
Threads: 60
Joined: Jun 2008

' Wrote:All-white tech chart would fix everyone's problem.

[font=Agency FB]Much as it would, the problem will remain, that if someone's cool with a faction leader on Skype, they'll get impossible combos a lot, only to "pwn" in PvP. There's still a need for some type of control over the permissions, I realized recently. Bias would grow from a slight nuisance to a gargantuan beast of a problem.

Sucks to be a weight on the wrong side of the brilliance-insanity scale.
Reply  
Pages (19): « Previous 1 … 6 7 8 9 10 … 19 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode