the rule is not to attack anyone under level 30. doesn't say anything about what ships are allowed to attack each other. i'm not going to let people nick pick rules with me, sorry. it'd be out of RP for Mon'Star to knowingly allow a victim to go by without atleast trying to kill them.
when i was a noob here i got taken out by the Phantoms..sure i caused a stink but that was because i was green and didn't understand their role.
you make it sound like i only camp Texas, that's just crazy. i'm all over the place.
I do have a problem with Mon'Star. It is true that you attack low level players, and that's just lame. If you do return to the same spot, where you died to "terrorize"... that's lame too. Yes, your RP stories on the forum are great, but your RP ingame is a bit off.
I would vote for a review about your Terrorist ID.:sleep:
Glyph
One small edit though: if you write "HAHAHAH" after everything you say... that sounds an awful lot like a pvp abuser. I think you should use something terrorizing, not a childish laughter after every sentence you say. Just my opinion.
' Wrote:the rule is not to attack anyone under level 30. doesn't say anything about what ships are allowed to attack each other. i'm not going to let people nick pick rules with me, sorry. it'd be out of RP for Mon'Star to knowingly allow a victim to go by without atleast trying to kill them.
when i was a noob here i got taken out by the Phantoms..sure i caused a stink but that was because i was green and didn't understand their role.
you make it sound like i only camp Texas, that's just crazy. i'm all over the place.
For the past few days everytime you were on you were at the NY/Texas Jump Gate. Casually killing NPC's and poping any poor new player who happened to not have the wit to check there is a crazed maniac. The point of my post is that you should move. I am saying you should be all over the place!
You were driven from this point and returned to camp that area again. Should I have to continually RP driving you off? Wait I cannot because you should not be-rengaged. Honestly a new player comes on, jumps from the safety of New Youk into Texas straight into the face of an Outcast destroyer hell-bent on destruction of all?
"HAHAHAHA Fair game!" Sorry I do not think so.
The more you try and justify camping this area, the more I come to beleive the admins should review your terroist ID! So I am now asking for an admins opinion on this.
' Wrote:I do have a problem with Mon'Star. It is true that you attack low level players, and that's just lame. If you do return to the same spot, where you died to "terrorize"... that's lame too. Yes, your RP stories on the forum are great, but your RP ingame is a bit off.
I would vote for a review about your Terrorist ID.:sleep:
Glyph
i do not attack low level players...never have never will. level 29 and below is considered low level per the rules
i'm not sure you guys realise what Mon'Star is.
i'll refer to a quote from wiki on Psychopathy:
In current clinical use, psychopathy is most commonly diagnosed using the checklist devised by Emeritus Professor Robert Hare. He describes psychopaths as "intraspecies predators who use charm, manipulation, intimidation, and violence to control others and to satisfy their own selfish needs. Lacking in conscience and in feelings for others, they take what they want and do as they please, violating social norms and expectations without guilt or remorse". "What is missing, in other words, are the very qualities that allow a human being to live in social harmony."
i'm not breaking any rules and am playing my character to the tee.
' Wrote:For the past few days everytime you were on you were at the NY/Texas Jump Gate. Casually killing NPC's and poping any poor new player who happened to not have the wit to check there is a crazed maniac. The point of my post is that you should move. I am saying you should be all over the place!
You were driven from this point and returned to camp that area again. Should I have to continually RP driving you off? Wait I cannot because you should not be-rengaged. Honestly a new player comes on, jumps from the safety of New Youk into Texas straight into the face of an Outcast destroyer hell-bent on destruction of all?
"HAHAHAHA Fair game!" Sorry I do not think so.
The more you try and justify camping this area, the more I come to beleive the admins should review your terroist ID! So I am now asking for an admins opinion on this.
i've not been trying to justify camping there, i already said i agreed with you and i left.
So, it's just me or it seems that lvl 40 is a fighter? You are a terrorist? Good for you, fight some pretty decent players with decent fighters/bombers, not people with Defenders. From what I see, that is just lame. And yes, if I'd be a new guy and someone would blow my Defender with a Capital Ship, I'd say that all the guys here are wackos. And I'd probably flame you, and leave.
Your in-game RP is a bit off, and an admin review on your ID and ion how you RP your char is needed.
And about 'our' understanding about your char: Make it easy for us! From what I see, you are behaving like a pvp abuser.
ok...you have RL
good for you.
everyone has RL
tell them you have an RL issue, and log.
people will accept that.
my problem, with your rp...is you have a cruiser, and you claim he's only going to use it to kill underlevel chars?
did it ever occur to you, that there are fights that you can get into, that you are sure to win, against players who are actually equipped?
if I split my forces to every conner of the map, you can find one, and engage them, and if some other's arive....run?
or, I will continue to ignore you.
its not worth my time, in my game, to follow a char who I honestly don't believe is going to give me a chance to fight them.
and...underlevel chars...aren't part of the RP yet.
they aren't equipped, and pretty much every faction ignores them on their quest for a right ship and id and tag.
so, sorry if I just completely disregard a very large part of your 'RP'
oh, and, I for a review about your Terrorist ID
a roving maniac does not a terrorist make.
' Wrote:i've not been trying to justify camping there, i already said i agreed with you and i left.
Yes I know.. That is what I originally wrote.
' Wrote:I PM'd him (out-of-RP) and suggested he move on as it seemed poor RP to just sit stationary in the very same spot he had been removed from. To his credit he was very understanding and removed himself from Texas to terrorise California.
We no longer have a problem, camping this one area was the only thing I took issue with. If you no longer intend to do this then our debate is now over.
' Wrote:ok...you have RL
good for you.
everyone has RL
tell them you have an RL issue, and log.
people will accept that.
my problem, with your rp...is you have a cruiser, and you claim he's only going to use it to kill underlevel chars?
did it ever occur to you, that there are fights that you can get into, that you are sure to win, against players who are actually equipped?
if I split my forces to every conner of the map, you can find one, and engage them, and if some other's arive....run?
or, I will continue to ignore you.
its not worth my time, in my game, to follow a char who I honestly don't believe is going to give me a chance to fight them.
and...underlevel chars...aren't part of the RP yet.
they aren't equipped, and pretty much every faction ignores them on their quest for a right ship and id and tag.
so, sorry if I just completely disregard a very large part of your 'RP'
oh, and, I for a review about your Terrorist ID
a roving maniac does not a terrorist make.
yes i have a cruiser....AND a fighter. i'm not always in my cruiser.
as for me claiming to only kill underlevel characters? where the crap are you getting this stuff? low level characters are level 29 and below...i've specifically stated i do not attack them and never will.
Unselie would you be basing your opinion on 1 maybe 2 incidence? doesn't sound right to me
underlevel is anyone who is not set up.
if I am level 90, because I transferred 1.2 bill to my starflea....I AM STILL UNDERLEVEL
And, yes, I am biasing my opinion of you.
on A: the 6 times I have been in an engagement with you, and no one fired a shot for an hour
and B: what the people I communicate with say about you.
its pretty much my only frame of reference on you.
and it is ugly as hell.
Ok, what underlevel means to me: If I fly a Cruiser (lvl 70), and I attack a lvl 55 fighter, it means I have attacked an underlevel player. Underlevel is not 1-29. It's his level, compared to yours. Reflect about this, and please stop doing angry posts people... it's a debate.
![[Image: 545pxroyalcoatofarmsofs.th.png]](http://img96.imageshack.us/i/545pxroyalcoatofarmsofs.png/)
