Auxesia "Redacted". Really now?

[Chrono]

So it's come to my attention that Auxesia has started redacting some of their threads and bits of their posts to seem less self righteous in regards to the Order. I just wonder if this should be permitted, removing bits of RP and OORP things to make them seem less bigoted and such. Now, I don't know of everything that has been removed, but I do know there have been things in their info page where they questioned vanilla game decisions as well as a few threads where they were overly antagonistic to the Order.

This to me, sounds as if they are trying to paint themselves in a better light, for what reasons, I have no clue. And then there is their recent team up with the Core, who if I'm not mistaken, are considered hostile to them. They were FR5ed by the Core, and then, when an Order POB is discovered, it is suddenly all roses and sunshine between the two groups as they decide to gank the base and make their attack notice within 10 minutes of their agreement, which was only a few hours from the first post from A/) to the Core.

I'd like an explanation of why these posts and threads were altered or removed, and seeing as how A/) has no feedback thread because they don't want to deal with people questioning their questionable FRP decisions and ingame actions, I'm forced to make this thread. And the sad thing is, I've been trying to avoid getting in the middle of this A/) / Order / Everyone else thing. But nope, can't do it any longer.

WTH A/) ?

---

[Shiki]

Well, first of all relations between Core and the Auxesia became warmer before Order built it's PoB and was originally based on Order/CR activities in Coronado. I can't really tell about A/)- redaction of their pages, since I've left the faction long time ago, but I see no issue in updating the lore and probably even retconning some parts.

---

[Alley]

Well, first of all relations between Core and the Auxesia became warmer before Order built it's PoB and was originally based on Order/CR activities in Coronado.

If Core| FR5'd A/) hostile to them and they later allied to destroy a POB that's a violation of the rules. You're not allowed to temporarily ally with an enemy unless the exemption exist in your ID like it did for some unlawfuls back in the Liberty/Rheinland war. If their diplomacy changed, another FR5 should be posted.

---

Alley was right.

[Jeremy Hunter]

Well, first of all relations between Core and the Auxesia became warmer before Order built it's PoB and was originally based on Order/CR activities in Coronado.

If Core| FR5'd A/) hostile to them and they later allied to destroy a POB that's a violation of the rules. You're not allowed to temporarily ally with an enemy unless the exemption exist in your ID like it did for some unlawfuls back in the Liberty/Rheinland war. If their diplomacy changed, another FR5 should be posted.

That was BHG.

Not Core.

[Shiki]

Well, first of all relations between Core and the Auxesia became warmer before Order built it's PoB and was originally based on Order/CR activities in Coronado.

If Core| FR5'd A/) hostile to them and they later allied to destroy a POB that's a violation of the rules. You're not allowed to temporarily ally with an enemy unless the exemption exist in your ID like it did for some unlawfuls back in the Liberty/Rheinland war. If their diplomacy changed, another FR5 should be posted.

I'm not in HC of those factions so i don't know if any requests were posted. I know only that some RP happened:

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=143114
http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=143878

Also A/)- was FR5'd by both BHG| and the Core|, almost BHG|Core.

---

[Omicron]

It's hillarious that group of Core traitors, with stolen Core hardware is now hugging their past "overlords" that they still have marked as hostile on their repsheet. Makes me question why the faction has abandoned Core ID to begin with given that there isn't any difference between the two in the end. I guess my comment is invalid because it does not support Vendetta's new Sirius order, as ussual.

[Alley]

That was BHG.
Not Core.

I believe Chrono is talking about this declaration

Name of player(s)/faction(s): The Core, Battlegroup Auxesia and allies
Name of Player Owned Base: Kebok Survey Station
Link to RP showing intent to attack: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1825979

Which is kinda problematic as Auxesia's faction status still list Core as hostile and the FR5 on Aux posted by Core is still in effect.

---

Alley was right.

[Shiki]

I forgot that A/)- was also FR5'd by the Order and clearly hostile to the Outcasts and Corsairs. I can see this wise diplomatic approach.

---

[Chrono]

That was BHG.
Not Core.

I believe Chrono is talking about this declaration

Name of player(s)/faction(s): The Core, Battlegroup Auxesia and allies
Name of Player Owned Base: Kebok Survey Station
Link to RP showing intent to attack: http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread...pid1825979

Which is kinda problematic as Auxesia's faction status still list Core as hostile and the FR5 on Aux posted by Core is still in effect.

Thats one of the things I'm on about, yes. But I'm also concerned about their removing things from their sub-forum to make their thoughts about certain factions seem less... hostile.

But yes, their attack on the Order POB was a bit out of bounds given their current status with the Core. Of course, it's not exactly a secret that Core and Aux are for the most part, one and the same.

[Jeremy Hunter]

I forgot that A/)- was also FR5'd by the Order and clearly hostile to the Outcasts and Corsairs. I can see this wise diplomatic approach.

Don't forget FR5'd by CR, LN, and I think LPI and 5th.

...I think that's a record.