• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery General Discovery RP 24/7 General Discussions
« Previous 1 … 353 354 355 356 357 … 778 Next »
A Topic On Guard Systems

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
A Topic On Guard Systems
Offline Akura
02-23-2011, 11:59 PM, (This post was last modified: 02-23-2011, 11:59 PM by Akura.)
#1
Member
Posts: 5,367
Threads: 167
Joined: Mar 2009

I already am in this frame of mind. Tohoku is the Iseijin Semi-Guard system.

Parts of the system will have nightmare defences and harsh NPCs, and parts of it are nice and lore-friendly and fit in with the rest of Sirius fine.

I think we need less Guard systems, and more Semi-Guard stuff in Semi-Guard sections of Systems.


I totally agree with you.
Reply  
Offline DarthBindo
02-23-2011, 11:59 PM,
#2
Member
Posts: 2,669
Threads: 125
Joined: Mar 2010

Kay.
I'm down with it.

[Image: tumblr_lyvivmGP711qk8923.gif]
gone four years, first day back: Zoners still getting shot in Theta :|
Reply  
Offline Panzer
02-24-2011, 12:01 AM,
#3
Man of iron, blood and Nyxes
Posts: 3,092
Threads: 56
Joined: Dec 2006

Game mechanics issues again.
Can't make guard systems too valuable to afford neglecting
Can't make normal people lose sleep over "an inevitable incoming attack"

[Image: Vxqj04i.gif]
Reply  
Offline Panzer
02-24-2011, 03:46 AM,
#4
Man of iron, blood and Nyxes
Posts: 3,092
Threads: 56
Joined: Dec 2006

Because I'm drunk.

Guard systems are lame for RP and day-to-day purposes because they were designed as half-ooc faction specific equipment shops and fallback points. They contain no trade (not usually) and rarely are in the way of any route. Changing their placement and trade usuefulness- that's issue number one.

Issue two is the factions themselves. While indeed they would welcome the increased traffic, if only for the sake of publicity... They would be reluctant to host hostile actions there. They bought it, they assume they make the rules there. For example I just don't see Outcasts just living with GMG incursions into omi85. They can't live with incursions into alpha as it is.

[Image: Vxqj04i.gif]
Reply  
Offline Zukeenee
02-24-2011, 06:37 AM,
#5
Member
Posts: 1,803
Threads: 82
Joined: Mar 2006

Agreed. Guard systems are a bit ridiculous. If we really wanna keep the whole "guard" thing going, we can just have a few somewhat-hidden guard bases. We don't need an entire star system in which we store our high-tech crap and do nothing else.

I've never been a fan of guard systems because they just don't do anything, with a few notable exceptions, like the ones you listed. So let's put them back in the hands of the developers (and out of the hands of the official factions; I never want to see another Tau 65) and develop them as actual, dynamic systems.

[Image: Zukeenee2.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Korny
02-24-2011, 06:41 AM,
#6
Member
Posts: 2,901
Threads: 139
Joined: Feb 2010

Ayup.

[Image: 60d.gif]
Reply  
Offline Rubber_Duck
02-24-2011, 07:35 AM,
#7
Member
Posts: 282
Threads: 43
Joined: Jul 2010


I somehow agree. Mostly they are used for Faction PvP, and to fit out caps and indy stuff, but since you can enter them by buying the respective id, the guard status becomes irrelevant.

The other way round, i think we shouldnt forget the importance of the guard system as pvp training ground, since many factions would have a way too long to conn, to attend a regular weekly training there.

In my opinion, this could be solved by establishing an area like a military training area, marked by a ring of navigation buoys, like it is in the LD-14 uranium field. To make clear that there is an area you shouldnt enter without permission...

On the other side, guard systems are used as an RP explanation to have a "safe base" there, like the flagship of a fleet commander, or what else. which cant be sieged or destroyed, because its in a well defended guard system.

So, some thoughts need to be made, surely, if the number of guard systems shall be reduced.
But in fact, yes. They arent necessary at all.

Rubber_Duck

[Image: IG7h5oH.jpg]
  Reply  
Offline Hastings
02-24-2011, 07:35 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 268
Threads: 8
Joined: Jan 2011

' Wrote:Agreed. Guard systems are a bit ridiculous. If we really wanna keep the whole "guard" thing going, we can just have a few somewhat-hidden guard bases. We don't need an entire star system in which we store our high-tech crap and do nothing else.

I've never been a fan of guard systems because they just don't do anything, with a few notable exceptions, like the ones you listed. So let's put them back in the hands of the developers (and out of the hands of the official factions; I never want to see another Tau 65) and develop them as actual, dynamic systems.

Like Newgate and stuff...hell, make Newgate the BPA guard station as an example.

[Image: 6jiq6p.jpg]

[Image: onlybretuserbar.png]
  Reply  
Offline TheJarl
02-24-2011, 07:53 AM,
#9
Member
Posts: 1,855
Threads: 84
Joined: May 2010

No one dares to touch Vespucci <.<

I mean it might technically be a guard system, but... it is really just something special. Although i think it won't be hacker at all any more in the next version, but would it still be a guard system then? And is the SCRA system a guard system?

[Image: yXeeIiN.png]
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
02-24-2011, 07:58 AM,
#10
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

I doubt that factions with their own ID would lose their systems.
I think this is about regular factions such as House forces etc.

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode