• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Welcome Help & Support
« Previous 1 … 295 296 297 298 299 … 494 Next »
Most fighters can't cloak

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (2): « Previous 1 2
Most fighters can't cloak
Offline Nosferath
04-07-2012, 03:06 PM,
#11
Member
Posts: 215
Threads: 16
Joined: Dec 2009

Ok, I'll try. But lately, the server has been having problems letting me in, I'll try to fix that.

[Image: lKTnYgl.png]

Slomon K'Hara - Faction Recruitment - Faction Information
Reply  
Offline Zapp
04-07-2012, 03:06 PM,
#12
Member
Posts: 4,978
Threads: 267
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:Providing a 1-5 minute period of cloaking has been seen and proven in some cases to be horribly horribly unbalancing. The only time ive seen it done correctly is when the cloaking time is unlimited but RECLOAKING is on a timer of at least 15-20 minutes.

This give cloaked ships (usualy the capital ships) the ability to launch a surprise attack but no chance of hitting the button to get away unscathed.

This leave open the ability for ships to get away if they dont use thier cloak.. but its not as good a tactic for large vessles because thier big and are still hittable.. an invisable barn is still a barn.

I quite like this idea.

[Image: u8rHEaq.png]
Reply  
Offline Govedo13
04-07-2012, 03:23 PM,
#13
Member
Posts: 4,663
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2009

I also agree with Zapp and Huggie. Cooldown timer is better then charging timer.

€œ
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

Reply  
Offline Zapp
04-07-2012, 04:58 PM,
#14
Member
Posts: 4,978
Threads: 267
Joined: Sep 2007

' Wrote:I also agree with Zapp and Huggie. Cooldown timer is better then charging timer.
After some thinking, it would take a bit more than just that, though. Imagine smugglers undocking, hitting cloak, then going through their entire run only to uncloak right before they dock at the end point and then they log off and do something else for 30 minutes or so.

It becomes a convenient way to avoid player interaction when doing things that should have consequences. Sure, you can make it take up more cargo, or even a percentage of cargo based on the size of the cargohold (talking about the max cargo, not the net cargo when you add in armor, weapons, and everything else).

Or you can make it so cloaks don't work with jump holes/gates or trade lanes (which they shouldn't anyways).

I'm sure there are plenty of ideas, but as of now we haven't seen enough of the current cloaking system to offer too many reasonable alternatives.

[Image: u8rHEaq.png]
Reply  
Offline Govedo13
04-07-2012, 09:12 PM,
#15
Member
Posts: 4,663
Threads: 97
Joined: Jul 2009

As far as I understood it this wont be possible if the smuggler does not have 1 barge full of fuel to support his cloak. So the time is connected with the fuel so it is balanced that way.

€œ
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

Reply  
Offline Zapp
04-07-2012, 09:51 PM,
#16
Member
Posts: 4,978
Threads: 267
Joined: Sep 2007

I was talking about a cloaking device that doesn't use fuel, but instead offers indefinite cloak with a cooldown timer.

[Image: u8rHEaq.png]
Reply  
Offline Nosferath
04-08-2012, 12:55 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 215
Threads: 16
Joined: Dec 2009

Govedo, check http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?...pic=122532
It's the most complete thing I've seen on Jump Drives, Surveys and Cloaks.

[Image: lKTnYgl.png]

Slomon K'Hara - Faction Recruitment - Faction Information
Reply  
Offline HuggieSunrise
04-09-2012, 05:12 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 1,559
Threads: 125
Joined: Jul 2008

Well We also had damage conditions. IE if the hull str was below 80% you cant cloak and also jumping/undocking/ Cd's and even countermeasures jammed the cloak.


these devices are hard to balance. keeping them "fun" and worthwhile for some new tatics are difficult
Reply  
Offline Nosferath
04-11-2012, 02:58 AM,
#19
Member
Posts: 215
Threads: 16
Joined: Dec 2009

So what's going to happen with the nom lf speed? Is this going to be fixed anytime soon?

[Image: lKTnYgl.png]

Slomon K'Hara - Faction Recruitment - Faction Information
Reply  
Pages (2): « Previous 1 2


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode