• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion Discovery Mod Balance
« Previous 1 … 27 28 29 30 31 … 55 Next »
Rebalancing the Falcata into a heavy bomber

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard
Gallic Royal Navy Forces - 83 / 10,000
Gallic Royal Navy Forces - 107 / 10,000
Liberty-Bretonia Combined Fleet - 33 / 10,000
Liberty-Bretonia Combined Fleet - 38 / 10,000

Latest activity

Pages (2): 1 2 Next »
Rebalancing the Falcata into a heavy bomber
Offline Mímir
01-16-2012, 08:26 PM,
#1
Member
Posts: 2,823
Threads: 182
Joined: Dec 2010

Hi with the introduction of the Cutlass, the Falcata is all but obsolete. Same number of guns, same powerplant, far more agile and only slightly(-ish) less armored. Already Outcasts are changing to Cutlasses big time.

So my suggestion is to refit the Falcata with the Praetorian power plant, make it equally slow while keeping the armor. That way the Outcast will have a heavy anti-cap/defensive bomber available, which they could certainly use with all the foreign capships hell-bent on invading Alpha atm, without it being overpowered compared to the Corsair counterpart. This change would give the Falcata a purpose again, without tipping the balance.

[Image: 120px-BhgLogo.png][Image: 120px-LH_Logo.png]
Reply  
Offline Prysin
01-16-2012, 08:45 PM,
#2
Apex Predator
Posts: 3,098
Threads: 165
Joined: Jul 2009

uhm the Cutlass isnt "far more agile".... its "slightly" more agile.

Ive flown the falcatta a long time and when i exchanged it for a Cutlass the difference was nothing but minor.... perhaps it is faster, but it certainly dont FEEL faster

[Image: v1zVWKX.png]
DHC Discord
Reply  
Offline Sava
01-16-2012, 09:33 PM,
#3
Member
Posts: 725
Threads: 54
Joined: Mar 2011

The point is that Outcasts have now access to 2 almost equall sabre-based bombers.
Turning Falcata into a middle bomber seems to be great.
Reply  
Offline Mímir
01-16-2012, 09:39 PM,
#4
Member
Posts: 2,823
Threads: 182
Joined: Dec 2010

' Wrote:uhm the Cutlass isnt "far more agile".... its "slightly" more agile.

Ive flown the falcatta a long time and when i exchanged it for a Cutlass the difference was nothing but minor.... perhaps it is faster, but it certainly dont FEEL faster

I disagree. I have a character with a falcata and a character with a cutlass atm, and when I swap between them, the difference is very noticeable.

But as sava said, the point is the OC have two somewhat similar bombers suited for similar tasks (where the cutlass imo outclasses the falcata as a light skirmish and/or pirate bomber), and if anything could use a bomber with the heavy power plant to defend Malta against all the capship assaults we're dealing with on a daily basis.

[Image: 120px-BhgLogo.png][Image: 120px-LH_Logo.png]
Reply  
Offline Tachyon
01-16-2012, 11:05 PM,
#5
Freelancer for Life
Posts: 2,664
Threads: 53
Joined: May 2011

Like I said before, make the Cutlass a very light bomber [mamouru like OMG PLEASE] and the Falcata a very heavy one [barghest like]

[Image: vJQQbhu.png]
Reply  
Offline globalplayer-svk
01-16-2012, 11:11 PM,
#6
Member
Posts: 1,526
Threads: 45
Joined: Sep 2007

mamoru like? you mean bomber almost more agile as corsair VHF ?

[Image: vladsignature.png]
  Reply  
Offline Tachyon
01-16-2012, 11:12 PM,
#7
Freelancer for Life
Posts: 2,664
Threads: 53
Joined: May 2011

' Wrote:mamoru like? you mean bomber almost more agile as corsair VHF ?

Yeah, but with (for bombers) paper-like armor and openly accessible, problem ?

[Image: vJQQbhu.png]
Reply  
Offline Syrus
01-17-2012, 11:52 AM,
#8
Member
Posts: 1,583
Threads: 86
Joined: Mar 2010

Don't get why they didn't just removed the Falcata.
I'd say just make it heavier and give it more energy and armor.
But not a 2 SNAC/Torp + 1 CD slot bomber. That would make the Corsairs cr...ehm, unhappy.

[Image: 7tAtSZe.png]
Reply  
Offline Hone
01-17-2012, 12:22 PM,
#9
Banned
Posts: 4,577
Threads: 287
Joined: Jan 2010

whyd they add the cutlass, when they already had the simillar falcata?

User was banned for: Griefing others
Time left: (Permanent)
Reply  
Offline AeternusDoleo
01-17-2012, 12:51 PM,
#10
Ex-Developer
Posts: 5,744
Threads: 149
Joined: Nov 2009

You guys are forgetting... one is an open BW ship, the other is a dedicated OC snub.

' Wrote:Don't get why they didn't just removed the Falcata.
I'd say just make it heavier and give it more energy and armor.
But not a 2 SNAC/Torp + 1 CD slot bomber. That would make the Corsairs cr...ehm, unhappy.
So it would do nothing new you're saying?:D

Wide awake in a world that sleeps, enduring thoughts, enduring scenes. The knowledge of what is yet to come.
From a time when all seems lost, from a dead man to a world, without restraint, unafraid and free.


Mostly retired Discovery member. May still visit from time to time.
Reply  
Pages (2): 1 2 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode