' Wrote:If i got it right, no one is restricting the Mollys to go in the field in H4 or the one at north (don't remember exactly), just that they will face a stronger opposition, as it should be. Same applies for baf pilots going in Mollys territory, where they have more chances to get caught and destroyed by mollys.
Edit for Govedo13: That is exactly the point, Mollys should be still hostile to Bretonia imho.
Your idea conflicts with Dieters Idea.The same as the Henderson, I and the most of the reasonable people fail to see how you can make agreements and follow them with someone who is hostile to you?
If they Mollys and the BAF are red dead hostile there is no point of making Molly zones and BAF zones etc.. Then the whole proposal with you actually agree with is useless.
Please note that BMM is different from BAF... they are not the same faction....
I know it might be a bit strange but look it like the RHA/Sails and Unioners relations.
RHA and Sails are enemies, RHA and Unioners are allies. Unoners allow to the Sails to use their Bases in Rheinland. Enemy of my friend is not always exactly my enemy......, it is different then to have the same enemy.
I know it is hard to understand my points but I dont look on the factions like mollys as 100% pirate factions like Rogues or Line Hackers or Corsairs or Outcasts. They are more like freedom fighters in my point of view.
If Bretonia (BAF) want to cooperate with Mollys then they must give them something in exchange, if they dont want to cooperate with them then there is no point of such plan, they could just be declared hostile and should not except any help from them against their shared enemies.
(10-09-2013, 10:51 AM)Knjaz Wrote: Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)
