(03-03-2015, 04:50 PM)Parmenter Wrote: I'm with you Steve, but that would be taking away a System that Liberty can claim is still their own, through association of the name.
The same could be said about using the name Kansas
(03-03-2015, 04:49 PM)Mímir Wrote: POB's are of 0 significance when planning system changes - not everything is about you, believe it or not.
Again I suggested a compromise that honestly makes more sense from a balance standpoint. There is two mining fields why not split them between two neighboring systems then just stuffing them both in one system that just happens to be enemies of one of the groups that have an interest in the fields. Honestly having a field in Kansas that junkers can haul ore from would be in the interest of Hellfire cause you know more junkers to shoot at in their backyard.
Csn we PLEEEEEAAAASE... stop the Congress/POB discussion? You are burying every valid question about the redesign by the pointless discussion. Make a new thread, if you really have to discuss it in great length, then people who do not care for it can ignore it and this important thread would not be spammed with off-topic nonsense.
I was mainly making suggestions regarding the movement of the mining field described in the first post so I hardly call that off-topic but you do have a point about all this getting out of hand so I will shut up now lol