• Home
  • Index
  • Search
  • Download
  • Server Rules
  • House Roleplay Laws
  • Player Utilities
  • Player Help
  • Forum Utilities
  • Returning Player?
  • Toggle Sidebar
Interactive Nav-Map
Tutorials
New Wiki
ID reference
Restart reference
Players Online
Player Activity
Faction Activity
Player Base Status
Discord Help Channel
DarkStat
Server public configs
POB Administration
Missing Powerplant
Stuck in Connecticut
Account Banned
Lost Ship/Account
POB Restoration
Disconnected
Member List
Forum Stats
Show Team
View New Posts
View Today's Posts
Calendar
Help
Archive Mode




Hi there Guest,  
Existing user?   Sign in    Create account
Login
Username:
Password: Lost Password?
 
  Discovery Gaming Community Discovery Development Discovery Mod General Discussion
« Previous 1 … 100 101 102 103 104 … 546 Next »
Give big ships a support role

Server Time (24h)

Players Online

Active Events - Scoreboard

Latest activity

Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »
Give big ships a support role
Offline EisenSeele
11-06-2014, 10:11 AM,
#11
Herder of Cats
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 211
Joined: Jan 2010

(11-06-2014, 09:51 AM)Lonely_Ghost Wrote: Correct me, if I'm wrong, but haven't it always been an ultimate goal for discovery?

With all variety of ship classes, fighters and bombers are the most versatelite, most efficent, most deadly and most surviveable (I mean in massive combat, where big ships die very fast) ships.

[Citation needed]

(11-06-2014, 09:53 AM)sindroms Wrote: Since most devs in charge of ship balance are fighter purists, I suggest we avoid trying to get any changes done to capital ships just so that nobody gives them a reason to further nerf them ''because the community wanted changes done''.

They are more or less playable now. Let's try and keep them that way, shall we?

If the devs are lacking in enthusiasm for adding anything to non-fighter ships, then the correct course of action is to add devs that will do something about non-fighter ships.

Either that, or we should just make it official that non-snub flying players should just stop wasting their time on hoping that things will get better - call it what you want now, but things are very broken.

FEEDBACK
Reply  
Offline EisenSeele
11-06-2014, 10:13 AM,
#12
Herder of Cats
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 211
Joined: Jan 2010

(11-06-2014, 10:00 AM)Echo 7-7 Wrote:
(11-06-2014, 05:32 AM)EisenSeele Wrote: ... Have docking modules serve an actual purpose...

http://discoverygc.com/forums/showthread.php?tid=121752

Carriers are less than a fraction of all non-fighter combat ships - and it still doesn't address the problem of fighters being broken against everything else.

It's a nice start, but it's not even close to what DM's should be able to do.

FEEDBACK
Reply  
Offline sindroms
11-06-2014, 10:19 AM,
#13
Member
Posts: 9,434
Threads: 985
Joined: Feb 2008

That is not as easy as it sounds.
Caps have always been a rather contrivertial subject for Disco and nobody really wants to poke at them lest the whole thing breaks down.

While we have the fact that snubs and caps can interact pvp-wise, this will remain to be an issue.
From one side you do not want to make ships worth billions of credits worthless.
From the other side, you do not want to make it seem that the people with the biggest wallet win.

--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
Reply  
Offline Vogel
11-06-2014, 10:30 AM,
#14
Member
Posts: 687
Threads: 57
Joined: Jan 2010

[Image: sigh.gif]

It's not really a compliment when it's pity...

... This deja vu is killing me. It's like PTSD.
  Reply  
Offline EisenSeele
11-06-2014, 10:32 AM,
#15
Herder of Cats
Posts: 2,689
Threads: 211
Joined: Jan 2010

(11-06-2014, 10:19 AM)sindroms Wrote: That is not as easy as it sounds.
Caps have always been a rather contrivertial subject for Disco and nobody really wants to poke at them lest the whole thing breaks down.

While we have the fact that snubs and caps can interact pvp-wise, this will remain to be an issue.
From one side you do not want to make ships worth billions of credits worthless.
From the other side, you do not want to make it seem that the people with the biggest wallet win.

Pvp wise, removing snub cruise does little or nothing to change the actual combat balance between snubs and caps. I'm not calling for the change of damage values or anything else - snubgank will always be broken because it's just how the engine works.

The change I'm calling for is easy to impliment, just as easy to reverse, and would be a good start to addressing a very large issue with the inherent gap between snubs and non snubs.

(11-06-2014, 10:30 AM)Vogel Wrote: [Image: sigh.gif]

It's not really a compliment when it's pity...

... This deja vu is killing me. It's like PTSD.

8| Well, if there's no reason to expect that there will be any change to non-snub ship users being alienated, there's always cutting the loss and moving on.

FEEDBACK
Reply  
Offline Vogel
11-06-2014, 10:43 AM,
#16
Member
Posts: 687
Threads: 57
Joined: Jan 2010

EisenSeele Wrote:The change I'm calling for is easy to impliment...
EisenSeele Wrote:8| Well, if there's no reason to expect that there will be any change to non-snub ship users being alienated, there's always cutting the loss and moving on.
Quote:BDM| Economic Warfare Division

...

...

[Image: vL2VthF.gif]
  Reply  
Offline Alley
11-06-2014, 10:45 AM,
#17
Member
Posts: 4,524
Threads: 406
Joined: Jun 2009

stop with the gifs it's triggering my buffer systems

Laz Wrote: Alley was right.
Reply  
Offline SnakThree
11-06-2014, 10:47 AM,
#18
Member
Posts: 9,091
Threads: 337
Joined: Mar 2010

(11-06-2014, 10:45 AM)Alley Wrote: stop with the gifs it's triggering my buffer systems
I hear that buffer systems are being removed, so hold on tight!

[Image: rTrJole.png][Image: LJ88XSk.png]
[Image: ka0AQa5.png][Image: QwWqCS8.png]
  Reply  
Offline Omicron
11-06-2014, 11:20 AM,
#19
The Order
Posts: 4,745
Threads: 386
Joined: Nov 2009

Good luck trying to kill disco, BDM.

Your idea would not only completely destroy factions with no access to capital ships/carriers but also phaze into obscurity every system with no lanes present. Are you sincerely expecting it is a good idea to inhibit currently the only good way to stir up activity by actually flying around? Unless you somehow enjoy 5 hours flight time to Liberty because nobody of you has carrier at hand, I cant find you actually serious about this.

[Image: E9d8RnV.jpg?1]
Reply  
Offline Mímir
11-06-2014, 11:59 AM,
#20
Member
Posts: 2,823
Threads: 182
Joined: Dec 2010

Yay, it's gonna be even more fun going from Alpha to Gamma in a Sabre without cruise.

Terrible, terrible idea.

-1

[Image: 120px-BhgLogo.png][Image: 120px-LH_Logo.png]
Reply  
Pages (4): « Previous 1 2 3 4 Next »


  • View a Printable Version
  • Subscribe to this thread


Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



Powered By MyBB, © 2002-2025 MyBB Group. Theme © 2014 iAndrew & DiscoveryGC
  • Contact Us
  •  Lite mode
Linear Mode
Threaded Mode