PETITION: Retcon the size of Gallia in future versions.

[Azan27]

there will be alot more routes going from Gallia to Kusari

Connecting Gallia to Kusari and expecting activity to result is like connecting a hooker to a drug dealer and expecting some kind of moral integrity to result.

I would suggest making all of space smaller and more compact. I wouldn't suggest nuking the new systems, because they are full of rich and bountiful lore, but I would suggest merging a LOT of the systems (Not just the new ones, but most of the non-vanilla ones), making systems smaller and, in general, streamlining the flow of trade to have it go through numerous choke points.

---

Let it burn.

[RmJ]

Once it's placed into the mod it won't be removed.... leave Gallia alone...Start killing them and conquer the systems instead!

---

[Dab]

I was going to pass a proposal by the dev team post-.86 about doing this actually. As a system modder, it's imperative that every station and system you design has a purpose that isn't already fulfilled by another station/system. ie; That whatever your adding isn't redundant. Unfortunately, 75% of Gallia is redundant and really serves no purpose. Half of the new Gallic systems do not even have players, and every system has twice as many bases as it needs.

As such, I was going to suggest a retcon of the systems, removing about 2-3, and then removing about 1/3rd of the stations from the remaining systems, combining infocards/rumors/etc from the removed ones to the remaining ones.

At the very least, I want to consolidate stations closer together so everything isn't so horribly spread out and making the systems bigger and more complex than they should be.

I'll also have to have Igiss' permission for this I imagine.

---

[Stefz]

There's no point in discussing Gallia's matter. Seriously, stop trying, we all know we won't get anything. Just go play the game or something...

---

[jammi]

Connecting Gallia to Kusari and expecting activity to result is like connecting a hooker to a drug dealer and expecting some kind of moral integrity to result.

I would sig this for eternity if I had the room. :lol:

---

News article library, feedback and content requests.

[Jack_Henderson]

I think Gallia is big enough to host the 225 players alone.

I voted: "yes", twice.

---

+ IMG| DISCORD: https://discord.gg/TWrGWjp
+ IMG| IS RECRUITING: Click to find out more!

[Govedo13]

Gallia is bad, the server just does not have players for those systems- I was always been for reducing the currnet systems not for increasing it. I voted 2 times yes.

---

€œ

Official faction players that are often accused of elitism, never deploy them and have those weird, immersion killing "fair fight/dueling" suicidal hobbies. (yes, i've seen enough of those lolduels, where house military with overwhelming force on the field willingly loses a pilot in a duel. ffs.)

[Silmathien]

Since Gallias RP wants to conquering at least 3 other houses, its' size is logical to me. But the systems are too big. Searching for jumpholes is the nuts!

---

[Tachyon]

Keep Gallia to the .85 core systems and the very most important Core systems of .86 + one unlawful hide of a system, two at best. With that Gallia would be as big as any other house and it would have pretty much the same gaming experience, since, if I understood Dab right there, 75% is not needed anyways.

---

[Mao]

Gallia size = Sirius size (inRP)

Gallia is not just another house, part of a sector, it is an entire sector. If we think theoretically, Gallia has too few systems. Gallia has trade routes, good ones I might add. If the systems were smaller, fewer, the routes would be shorter and less productive, resulting in less profit and less activity.

I must say that trading in Gallia these days is very very relaxing. It's a good break from the Sirius crapstorms.

---