Maybe it wouldn't even need to be "them" building a wall but it is something that naturally happens? And they like it because it provides additional cover.
By naturally I mean: Junkers bring scrap to roch. And so more and more piles up.
Most of this nonsense would not be a problem if avoiding consequences was not negated for 2 mil credits.
Remember when we had to purchase renaming cards for 250 mil if we wanted to get away with upsetting some group?
--------------
PSA: If you have been having stutter/FPS lag on Disco where it does not run as smoothly as other games, please look at the fix here: https://discoverygc.com/forums/showthrea...pid2306502
----------
-Junkers need to move Rochester way away from any usable lanes or bases or build a "Junk wall" so no large ships can possibly dock there.
and
-Junkers are a non-essential presence that the government could eradicate out of house space if needed, any helpful role that junkers play is completely negated by corporations that scrap.
This is pretty silly if you ask me.
All the original intent of this thread was to do was to set some precedence regarding who important it is for the governing faction of Rochester base to comply to law enforcement demands regarding restricting the docking privileges of said criminals with a full on rep-hack. Hence the title.
If you want to spout non-sense that is not directly related to this issue please start your own thread to do it.
(01-27-2016, 11:11 AM)Skorak Wrote: I also suggest increasing the distance between Rochester and the lanes more. Both parties shouldn't be able to run so easily anymore. Maybe further away in the field or move it to one of the other fields? They are so underused anyways.
and also plays LPI- so this proposal is totally working in your favor hmm?