I'll admit the Tachi looks funny to me. And yes, I don't care for it, but it looks right for the Blood Dragons. It looks like it could be a much older model of ship that they put back into production.
(12-08-2017, 04:09 PM)Durandal Wrote: You know though, as a modeler, it's actually pretty hurtful to see people screaming about replacing the Tachi (the one that was meant to stay) without any rhyme or reason, especially now that its had a large portion of its wingspan removed to balance it out.
Replied @Sand_Spider and @Jadon King. Up to their factions to decide it if is good for them or not.
Slightly off-topic note, but the GC doesn't even have a VHF of their own, and have to use the BD's one, and theirs should take priority, but nobody seems even interested in taking it up.
Anyway, it's not exactly fair to conclude anything until the hitbox is fixed. I would like to use this ship without being accused of pvp abuse constantly, so I shall await the fix.
(07-12-2018, 05:54 PM)Sciamach Wrote: Outcast slavery is actually far better for the victim than the corporate slavery and crime-less imprisonment of the Houses down in places like Liberty Rheinland and Bretonia
(12-08-2017, 04:16 PM)Ends Wrote: Slightly off-topic note, but the GC doesn't even have a VHF of their own, and have to use the BD's one, and theirs should take priority, but nobody seems even interested in taking it up.
Anyway, it's not exactly fair to conclude anything until the hitbox is fixed. I would like to use this ship without being accused of pvp abuse constantly, so I shall await the fix.
From shoutbox:
08 Dec 16:15 - eigos - Wyvern hitbox - did a new one, working 100%.
So wait for the next patch
(12-08-2017, 04:16 PM)Ends Wrote: Slightly off-topic note, but the GC doesn't even have a VHF of their own, and have to use the BD's one, and theirs should take priority, but nobody seems even interested in taking it up.
Anyway, it's not exactly fair to conclude anything until the hitbox is fixed. I would like to use this ship without being accused of pvp abuse constantly, so I shall await the fix.
I actually agree. The reason only three reskins were done is due to the fact that @aerelm told me back in the day to only those two three, basically piss on it and let the BD/GC share. The working name for the GC VHF was the Iris.
(12-08-2017, 04:14 PM)Jadon King Wrote: It looks like it could be a much older model of ship that they put back into production.
I don't know if you've read the infocard, but this is literally the exact lore behind the Tachi.
(12-08-2017, 04:57 PM)Durandal Wrote: I don't know if you've read the infocard, but this is literally the exact lore behind the Tachi.
In fact I haven't. I'm not afraid to say Blood dragons never really interested me outside of having a Asteroid base the size of a Planet and actually being able to use the Red "Dragon" Model (That should've been playable in Vanilla when you actually helped BD)
(12-08-2017, 04:16 PM)Ends Wrote: Slightly off-topic note, but the GC doesn't even have a VHF of their own, and have to use the BD's one, and theirs should take priority, but nobody seems even interested in taking it up.
Anyway, it's not exactly fair to conclude anything until the hitbox is fixed. I would like to use this ship without being accused of pvp abuse constantly, so I shall await the fix.
I actually agree. The reason only three reskins were done is due to the fact that @aerelm told me back in the day to only those two three, basically piss on it and let the BD/GC share. The working name for the GC VHF was the Iris.
Hey! I indeed planned to approach some of our modellers about a GC VHF and was playing around with a few RP scenarios leading to its production already! Stop mentioning what I didn't lose a word about yet!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
![[+]](/forums/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Signature:
![[Image: vkVqwbl.jpg]](https://i.imgur.com/vkVqwbl.jpg)
![[Image: ARSW9RV.png]](https://i.imgur.com/ARSW9RV.png)