Removing remaining Guard IFFs

[Shiki]

Guard IFFs should stay.

For example, you have secret facilities of, idk, RM, that are not accessible to the public eye.

If youre friendly with the 'front view' assets of the RM, that doesnt mean they will allow you on their secret installations just like that.

My points is, Guard IFFs have a role. And they need to remain.

+1

If you think that some areas should be restricted then log in-game and enforce it instead of using outdated relic mechanics? That makes more sense.

---

[Unity]

Guards should never have been removed, i love the RP behind a secret installation for certain factions or a reserve fleet to press the attack if any groups dare to enter their systems, its not the same.

---

[Shiki]

Guards should never have been removed, i love the RP behind a secret installation for certain factions or a reserve fleet to press the attack if any groups dare to enter their systems, its not the same.

I don't mind the end, how about that fleet attacking being players and not guard NPCs? RP behind secret installations is not being changed, just junk being cleaned out of the mod.

---

[Traxit]

Guard IFFs should stay.

For example, you have secret facilities of, idk, RM, that are not accessible to the public eye.

If youre friendly with the 'front view' assets of the RM, that doesnt mean they will allow you on their secret installations just like that.

My points is, Guard IFFs have a role. And they need to remain.

+1

If you think that some areas should be restricted then log in-game and enforce it instead of using outdated relic mechanics? That makes more sense.

+1

---

The best Video Game OST

[Unity]

Guards should never have been removed, i love the RP behind a secret installation for certain factions or a reserve fleet to press the attack if any groups dare to enter their systems, its not the same.

I don't mind, how about that fleet attacking being players and not guard NPCs?

Yeah if the server had the numbers for every faction, not just the main ones.

---

[Shiki]

Guards should never have been removed, i love the RP behind a secret installation for certain factions or a reserve fleet to press the attack if any groups dare to enter their systems, its not the same.

I don't mind, how about that fleet attacking being players and not guard NPCs?

Yeah if the server had the numbers for every faction, not just the main ones.

If your faction has fewer numbers then you will most likely lose the interaction. Which is fairly normal in the competitive game. I don't see a problem nor does it justify guard systems that were usually quite poorly written and executed.

---

[SnakThree]

There are different ways to describe restricted locations. Good example that I know is Virginia with Trade Lane names ending in (Restricted).

Also, not all Guard reputations are on some IDs. For example, LN ID has no rephack towards KNF Guard.

So in the end, these IFFs are only confusing people, and there are alternatives, such as ID locked docking on "guarded" stations.

---

[Sabru]

there are alternatives, such as ID locked docking on "guarded" stations.

This could work for some "guarded" stations. I know it would work for Pueblo Bonito which, ideally, would be locked for docking only by zoners (due to it's very long history of being a protected and guarded holy land and headquarters of discordianism welcoming only to zoners unless invited)

---

[LuckyOne]

I don't think they need to be removed.

What they need to be is re-imagined. Make them a significant PvE gameplay element. Make them scary, with all kinds of top secret equipment (cloak disruptors, armor upgrades, unlimited cruise disruptors, CODENAME weapons... you name it). And increase their spawn rates significantly. Basically Discovery boss fights.

Then populate the guard systems with stations / wrecks / depots containing all kinds of contraband and quasi-legal stuff (the unused mission cargo from vanilla as commodities might be a good start), and maybe some RP based commodities such as Battleship / Battlecruiser / Prototype blueprints. Maybe some Sci-data too as an alternative for obtaining Sci-data for people who don't want to hunt for anomalies.

Then you have a nice, challenging PvE environment that can be used to RP common tropes (stealing military secrets or secret technology... or kidnapping important military personnel). Basically something that needs to be done as a build-up before you pull-up a totally bull____ story how your tiny faction managed to obtain access to highly classified technology / ships. It could be used as an alternative when there are no / very low numbers of player run Navy factions you could RP with. But it needs to be a hard alternative, requiring either specialized ships (high level cloak) and lots of luck or a major group effort.

Think the Proteus Tome mission in Tekagi's Arch but in multiplayer, with your faction's story at stake.

[Skorak]

You sadly cannot do any of these fancy npc ideas as they'll cease to spawn once Server load reaches a certain threshold that can be reached by as little as 40 players.

---