This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Zoners Guardian Administration"
(Please sign your comments properly (with your username) so it's easy to tell who wrote it. Added unsigned template.) |
(reply) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
+ | [http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=73691 The related forum topic] | ||
+ | |||
This group does not exist on the forums or server as far as I can tell, so unless it actually happens it doesn't really belong here... | This group does not exist on the forums or server as far as I can tell, so unless it actually happens it doesn't really belong here... | ||
[[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 09:48, 3 July 2010 (MDT) | [[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 09:48, 3 July 2010 (MDT) | ||
Line 7: | Line 9: | ||
I'd like to second Tomoe's recommendation that this be deleted. -Peter Kristall | I'd like to second Tomoe's recommendation that this be deleted. -Peter Kristall | ||
{{Unsigned|20:59, 14 July 2010|RockCrystal}} | {{Unsigned|20:59, 14 July 2010|RockCrystal}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | : And for the sake of fairness incase this does get left alive (doubtful) I'll post some issues.... | ||
+ | * First up is the way they originally listed ships that woudl require SRP or faction approval as part of their shipline (I removed it) | ||
+ | * Second is they list the ZA as allies. While the ZA would consider them at least freindly until proven otherwise, that does not make them allies, especially when they exist nowhere but here (troll attempt ? Come from a differnt server ?) | ||
+ | * Third, their escort pricing, they plan to use BATTLESHIPS to escort ? Let me just say ROFL. | ||
+ | * Fourth, the whole article is simply painful to read. yeah could proably be re-written but its not exactly anyones priority I'd assime. | ||
+ | * Fifth, they dont have any standing towards GMG ? They must not have a normal Zoner rep..... | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Kashiwaba Tomoe|Kashiwaba Tomoe]] 04:01, 18 July 2010 (MDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ---- | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | When i can say it, i am the creator of that page... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Therefore all people are agains THIS page... I WILL DELETE THIS PAGE... Really guys when you have problems with that then i would prefer better to talk to the person first who had create this page. I talked also to Cannon one of the Administrators and i had already changed much things. | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | It's doesn't be matter longer what you or the others think because this site will deleted in every case so i deleted it. My intention was it only to create a new group which have a Role Play. Good to know what they are think about... | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I am done now, cshake you can ban me now for that what i have said but i followed the instructions which you gave me and the admins and i think i haven't deserved this association. | ||
+ | It is really a very funny joke to shot someone first in the head and then to ask what he has done wrong... | ||
+ | |||
+ | --[[User:Dragoonfly|Dragoonfly]] 15:20, 19 July 2010 (MDT) | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | Why would I ban you? You made a page that didn't fit with RP but then learned more about it and removed it yourself. I see no reason to interfere. [[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 18:39, 19 July 2010 (MDT) |
Latest revision as of 00:39, 20 July 2010
This group does not exist on the forums or server as far as I can tell, so unless it actually happens it doesn't really belong here... ~cshake (talk) (sysop) 09:48, 3 July 2010 (MDT)
I suggest this be deleted, and the account/IP it was posted from be banned. Or at least move it to a 'joke' catagory, and lock it from editing. Also, removed non-zoner ships from their shiplist, considering they have no presence anywere but the wiki it seems innacurate to list ships that would be sanctionable if they used. --Kashiwaba Tomoe 01:21, 7 July 2010 (MDT)
I'd like to second Tomoe's recommendation that this be deleted. -Peter Kristall
- The above unsigned entry was written by RockCrystal (Talk | contribs) on 20:59, 14 July 2010
- And for the sake of fairness incase this does get left alive (doubtful) I'll post some issues....
- First up is the way they originally listed ships that woudl require SRP or faction approval as part of their shipline (I removed it)
- Second is they list the ZA as allies. While the ZA would consider them at least freindly until proven otherwise, that does not make them allies, especially when they exist nowhere but here (troll attempt ? Come from a differnt server ?)
- Third, their escort pricing, they plan to use BATTLESHIPS to escort ? Let me just say ROFL.
- Fourth, the whole article is simply painful to read. yeah could proably be re-written but its not exactly anyones priority I'd assime.
- Fifth, they dont have any standing towards GMG ? They must not have a normal Zoner rep.....
--Kashiwaba Tomoe 04:01, 18 July 2010 (MDT)
When i can say it, i am the creator of that page...
Therefore all people are agains THIS page... I WILL DELETE THIS PAGE... Really guys when you have problems with that then i would prefer better to talk to the person first who had create this page. I talked also to Cannon one of the Administrators and i had already changed much things.
It's doesn't be matter longer what you or the others think because this site will deleted in every case so i deleted it. My intention was it only to create a new group which have a Role Play. Good to know what they are think about...
I am done now, cshake you can ban me now for that what i have said but i followed the instructions which you gave me and the admins and i think i haven't deserved this association.
It is really a very funny joke to shot someone first in the head and then to ask what he has done wrong...
--Dragoonfly 15:20, 19 July 2010 (MDT)
Why would I ban you? You made a page that didn't fit with RP but then learned more about it and removed it yourself. I see no reason to interfere. ~cshake (talk) (sysop) 18:39, 19 July 2010 (MDT)