This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Gun-Mounted Missiles"
m (Talk:Missiles and Torpedoes moved to Talk:Missiles) |
m (Ursus moved page Talk:Missiles to Talk:Gun-Mounted Missiles) |
||
(2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | Moved to [[Missiles]], because there is already a [[Torpedoes]] page. I believe all links leading to the old page have been redirected here now. --[[User:Hellfire0|hellfire0]] 18:03, 11 December 2008 (MST) | |
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | I have created the missiles content - this page was a conspicuous hole in this Wiki. I removed the "energy" category from the table, as this information was not attainable by me. If anyone else has that complete information, feel free to add it in - but all the essential information is there. | ||
+ | |||
+ | I've also removed the entire Missile Turrets table - it had no content so I saw no harm. I would also say that, long-run, the Missile Turrets should be part of the "Class X Turrets" pages. If we want to do a separate table as well I would support that - but as a double-up, and certainly separate from these missiles. Feedback? [[User:JRawk|JRawk]] 23:22, 21 December 2008 (MST) |
Latest revision as of 14:23, 24 October 2012
Moved to Missiles, because there is already a Torpedoes page. I believe all links leading to the old page have been redirected here now. --hellfire0 18:03, 11 December 2008 (MST)
I have created the missiles content - this page was a conspicuous hole in this Wiki. I removed the "energy" category from the table, as this information was not attainable by me. If anyone else has that complete information, feel free to add it in - but all the essential information is there.
I've also removed the entire Missile Turrets table - it had no content so I saw no harm. I would also say that, long-run, the Missile Turrets should be part of the "Class X Turrets" pages. If we want to do a separate table as well I would support that - but as a double-up, and certainly separate from these missiles. Feedback? JRawk 23:22, 21 December 2008 (MST)