YellowWarningTriangle.png This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date.

Difference between revisions of "User talk:Nodwick"

From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(New page: == Thanks == Yes, i didnt notice my spelling mistake, thanks for making me notice it, i like the idea of the head lines, but we need to think about: How is the hierarchy going to be, be...)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
 
 
== Thanks ==
 
== Thanks ==
  
  
Yes, i didnt notice my spelling mistake, thanks for making me notice it, i like the idea of the head lines, but we need to think about: How is the hierarchy going to be, because most of the Border Worlds are controlled either by an Outcast faction (like BLS,RoS,101st) or by Corsirs, Nomads, etc. I also thought on somthing like: Lawful/Unlawful/Neutrals, and putting the systems inside them
+
I didnt find any spelling mistake in "independant". Yet i like the idea of the head lines, but we need to think about: How is the hierarchy going to be, because most of the Border Worlds are controlled either by an Outcast faction (like BLS,RoS,101st) or by Corsirs, Nomads, etc. I also thought on somthing like: Lawful/Unlawful/Neutrals, and putting the systems inside them
 
e.g
 
e.g
  

Revision as of 20:32, 9 May 2008

Thanks

I didnt find any spelling mistake in "independant". Yet i like the idea of the head lines, but we need to think about: How is the hierarchy going to be, because most of the Border Worlds are controlled either by an Outcast faction (like BLS,RoS,101st) or by Corsirs, Nomads, etc. I also thought on somthing like: Lawful/Unlawful/Neutrals, and putting the systems inside them e.g

Player Factions(Link) --------> Unlawful(Link) -------------> Liberty Space (Header only, with a small description) -------> Liberty Rogues (Link)

tell me what do you think about this to see how can we make it work correctly.

Honestic 10:26 (GMT), May 9 2008