This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Ipuvaepe"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (→Page Deletion Marks: spammer user pages) |
|||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
[[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 23:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | [[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 23:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC) | ||
:Err, on second run through, please don't create user pages for the spammers, I look at the page history when deleting the spam itself and block them through that link. No need to make a whole new page for them. | :Err, on second run through, please don't create user pages for the spammers, I look at the page history when deleting the spam itself and block them through that link. No need to make a whole new page for them. | ||
+ | ::Yeah, by the time I thought about it the damage had already been done. As you can see, I haven't done that in a while. - [[User:Ipuvaepe|Ipuvaepe]] 01:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:09, 5 October 2011
Page Deletion Marks
I came back for a random round of deletion queue emptying, and your name popped up more than others. Thanks for tagging them! ~cshake (talk) (sysop) 23:26, 4 October 2011 (UTC)
- Err, on second run through, please don't create user pages for the spammers, I look at the page history when deleting the spam itself and block them through that link. No need to make a whole new page for them.
- Yeah, by the time I thought about it the damage had already been done. As you can see, I haven't done that in a while. - Ipuvaepe 01:09, 5 October 2011 (UTC)