|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:VHF Combat"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (New page: =="A VHF is a bomber's worst nightmare"== This is debatable. In my experience, VHFs are easier than LFs for a bomber to handle. Granted, a poorly flown LF will blow up more or less immedia...) |
m |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
This is debatable. In my experience, VHFs are easier than LFs for a bomber to handle. Granted, a poorly flown LF will blow up more or less immediately against a bomber's weaponry, but a well-flown LF won't have to look down those SNACk barrals. | This is debatable. In my experience, VHFs are easier than LFs for a bomber to handle. Granted, a poorly flown LF will blow up more or less immediately against a bomber's weaponry, but a well-flown LF won't have to look down those SNACk barrals. | ||
| − | I would say it's safer to say that VHFs are generally more all-purpose than most other classes. They can carry heavy weaponry, not as many as bombers, but equally heavy and enough to take on large targets while still being able to carry anti-fighter juice. | + | I would say it's safer to say that VHFs are generally more all-purpose than most other classes. They can carry heavy weaponry, not as many as bombers, but equally heavy and enough to take on large targets while still being able to carry anti-fighter juice. |
| + | --[[User:Eyvind|Eyvind]] 16:51, 14 February 2009 (MST) | ||
Revision as of 23:51, 14 February 2009
"A VHF is a bomber's worst nightmare"
This is debatable. In my experience, VHFs are easier than LFs for a bomber to handle. Granted, a poorly flown LF will blow up more or less immediately against a bomber's weaponry, but a well-flown LF won't have to look down those SNACk barrals.
I would say it's safer to say that VHFs are generally more all-purpose than most other classes. They can carry heavy weaponry, not as many as bombers, but equally heavy and enough to take on large targets while still being able to carry anti-fighter juice. --Eyvind 16:51, 14 February 2009 (MST)
