Difference between revisions of "Talk:Official Player Factions"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
[[User:Igiss|Igiss]] 12:21, 14 May 2008 (GMT) | [[User:Igiss|Igiss]] 12:21, 14 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Please have a look at [[Liberty Player Factions]] for a format proposal. I took the time to format the factions that were there into a sortable table. | ||
| + | |||
| + | I like the idea to put Affiliation there instead of Alignment, that would make the Outcasts/Corsairs easier to classify. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Is the list you put up composed of official factions only, or does it contain unofficials, too? | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 08:40, 14 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
Revision as of 08:40, 14 May 2008
Pages that have to be merged with this one
- Liberty Player Factions
- Bretonia Player Factions
- Kusari Player Factions
- Rheinland Player Factions
- Hispania Player Factions
- Other Player Factions
Allied/neutral/enemy/etc.
I think the information about who is ally/enemy/neutral towards whom would be better placed on the pages of the factions themselves.
Nodwick 08:05, 14 May 2008 (GMT)
Not sure about the format yet. Will add info from http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=1304 to make this more precise.
Igiss 12:21, 14 May 2008 (GMT)
Please have a look at Liberty Player Factions for a format proposal. I took the time to format the factions that were there into a sortable table.
I like the idea to put Affiliation there instead of Alignment, that would make the Outcasts/Corsairs easier to classify.
Is the list you put up composed of official factions only, or does it contain unofficials, too?
Nodwick 08:40, 14 May 2008 (GMT)
