Difference between revisions of "Talk:Style Guide Systems"
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
::I see your point. Maybe just embed them to text when appropriate. Is the System guide finished yet? If so then "Yeah!". Most of the needed pages are systems. And maybe a link to Example page would be nice like in Planet style guide? Now it's a bit confusing is New York the one or maybe Cambridge. --[[User:Looqas|Looqas]] 06:03, 18 September 2008 (GMT) | ::I see your point. Maybe just embed them to text when appropriate. Is the System guide finished yet? If so then "Yeah!". Most of the needed pages are systems. And maybe a link to Example page would be nice like in Planet style guide? Now it's a bit confusing is New York the one or maybe Cambridge. --[[User:Looqas|Looqas]] 06:03, 18 September 2008 (GMT) | ||
| − | I | + | I made a draft for Dresden, but then when I was looking at the template I ran into some problems: The Wild are there also. They fit a bit badly under "unlawful" category. So what should be done? |
| − | Also, we do not have any "individual" place for text describing the system at all | + | Also, we do not have any "individual" place for text describing the system at all. Some info about the history and surroundings of the system (when found, heavily polluted because... etc.) And a "See Also" section would be nice. Maybe. What I miss most is the text part. Without it looks too clinical and does not allow sneaking a scenery picture into it. I think a picture of the scenery sets a mood for the system. (--[[User:Looqas|Looqas]] 12:38, 19 September 2008 (GMT) |
Revision as of 12:55, 19 September 2008
"Terrain Features"
How about having a section for those "terrain features" like nebula, asteroid field etc? It would bring flavor to the article. --Looqas 07:21, 17 September 2008 (GMT)
- I was considering that, but there are things that should probably be discovered as well. If a section like that goes in, every joe blogs will add every single little space thing in there. I'm still thinking on this one. I have a funny feeling Igiss would be against it. I dont know if having a section like that is a good idea or not. I can see benefits to having it in, and benefits to leaving it out.Chovynz 04:57, 18 September 2008 (GMT)
- I see your point. Maybe just embed them to text when appropriate. Is the System guide finished yet? If so then "Yeah!". Most of the needed pages are systems. And maybe a link to Example page would be nice like in Planet style guide? Now it's a bit confusing is New York the one or maybe Cambridge. --Looqas 06:03, 18 September 2008 (GMT)
I made a draft for Dresden, but then when I was looking at the template I ran into some problems: The Wild are there also. They fit a bit badly under "unlawful" category. So what should be done? Also, we do not have any "individual" place for text describing the system at all. Some info about the history and surroundings of the system (when found, heavily polluted because... etc.) And a "See Also" section would be nice. Maybe. What I miss most is the text part. Without it looks too clinical and does not allow sneaking a scenery picture into it. I think a picture of the scenery sets a mood for the system. (--Looqas 12:38, 19 September 2008 (GMT)
