User talk:Blodo

From Discovery Wiki
Revision as of 23:29, 17 February 2009 by Eyvind (talk | contribs)
Jump to navigationJump to search

I did a lot of modifications to RHA page. Mainly links and additions. I'm thinking of starting doing the systems in RHA ZOI once we wiki people can decide upon the template and system and base naming conventions. Before that it's wasted work. I like those existing system pages like New York and it is a good template to work on. Looqas 12:33, 6 August 2008 (GMT)


Ship images.

Awesome work man! Can you use the Isometric view when you put images up? Chovynz 22:45, 13 August 2008 (GMT)


Well I reused one of the images from the render thread on the disco forums. There are a few renders there, but definitely not enough to fill out all the ships. I will use the isometric render whenever there is one though. If I get a white background to work in FL, I might put up a few of my own renders up. --Blodo 23:01, 13 August 2008 (GMT)


Skype!Chovynz 05:55, 15 September 2008 (GMT)

Weapons

The slip in the table of level 10 codies is calculated? It looks boring, in my opinion, you should put an "unknown" to the type instead of slipping the whole codie table one to the left.

Tips

Any tips for making new pages for discovery? (i am currently completing bases in new york system) i have done Two.

--Discovery-shadow 02:26, 11 November 2008 (MST)

Edited --Discovery-shadow 02:28, 11 November 2008 (MST) (spelling/spacing)

Thank you Blodo for you're help.

General Comments

Thanks for correcting me on the Bretonia thing. I must've missed that. The sentence looked like it had something missing, so I assumed too much. :) Chovynz 16:58, 17 November 2008 (MST)


Template:Faction Diplomacy

In order to simplify and shorten markup required to use this template:

I also updated the two places that the template has been put in use so far:

As you can see, the markup is much more concise now. I hope you approve, if not we should discuss. We can begin incorporating the template into more pages as soon as we agree.

-- Eyvind (talkcontrib) 16:29, 17 February 2009 (MST)