|
|
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | ==Thanks. Diplomacy==
| + | >>Cleared of entries more than 2 years old.<< |
| − | Hello. I noticed that you changed much of the Diplomacy, to the new allies and enemies templates. Thanks for doing that. It was VERY useful of you. [[User:Chovynz| ~Chovynz~ ]] <sup>([[User_talk:Chovynz|Blabs]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chovynz|Ego]]) </sup> 18:15, 26 August 2009 (MDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | I use this wiki a lot. When I found the new template I was very happy. Thanks for noticing my contribution, it's good to know that this resource is being monitored.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ~RogueCharlie
| |
| − | | |
| − | I am pretty sure that with your help, the Diplomacy Templates will be applied in no time. Also, dont forget to check if all the diplomacy is correct. Appart from that, good job. Also, to sign automaticaly, use four ~ one after the other. "[[User:Skatepro0|Skatepro0]] 11:36, 28 August 2009 (MDT)"
| |
| − | | |
| − | ==Corsair Diplomacy==
| |
| − | "I made sure the NPC diplomacy matches in game information exactly. [[Golden Chrysanthemums]] are not listed as an enemy of the [[Corsairs]] in game (Using F8) so I undid your false edit. Player faction diplomacy belongs on player faction pages, the NPC pages must match in-game information precisely. [[User:RogueCharlie|RogueCharlie]] 14:36, 15 September 2009 (MDT)"
| |
| − | | |
| − | Since two of their allies were Hogosha and Gaians, I assumed it appropriate to have GC on the enemy list, especially since the GC faction (NPC) has Corsairs on their enemy list. It should be accurate, not just carbon-copies of the infocard. [[User:Dab|Dab]] 17:26, 15 September 2009 (MDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :That might be appropriate for the player factions but the NPC pages must accurately show what is displayed in game. It took me several hours to go back and forth between the individual wiki pages and the appropriate cards in F8 to match everything exactly, as I was instructed to do by the wiki hosts. RogueCharlie 20:40, 15 September 2009 (MDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::Unless you (RogueCharlie) are talking about Igiss in a conversation I'm not aware of, I and Blodo are not Wiki hosts. I'm a Sysop, and appealing to a high authority is a weak way of resolving the "conflict".
| |
| − | | |
| − | ::For the Record I agree that the NPC factions should have the ingame diplomacy, however this is still between you two at this stage. Let me know what you guys have decided and we can make it "Wiki Policy". If you can't resolve this, then we might need some Wiki Team consultation. ~Chovynz~ (Blabs • Ego) 21:40, 15 September 2009 (MDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | (Copied from Dab's talk page)
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::I was referring to the feedback on my mytalk page by [[User:Skatepro0|Skatepro0]] to "...dont forget to check if all the diplomacy is correct." I don't know who is whom as far as admins / sysops of the wiki as I'm new to contributing. I do know that the advise given made perfect sense to me as I had planned to match everything up due to changes between 4.84 and 4.85.
| |
| − | | |
| − | :::As for the "conflict," I only find it appropriate that newbies should find the most accurate information on the NPC pages and then check individual faction pages for differences to aid them in choosing among them. That and I would never think to change information given in this wiki without accurate background information (like the information clearly printed in game on the F8 cards) or direct advise from someone who actually is in authority. Then there is the [[Wiki Editing Rules]] page that also clearly states, right in the first section labeled General, "...No submitting subjective, or unverifiable information. This usually means sorting faction diplomacy out on the forums first,..." and "The wiki data MUST be accurate." [[User:RogueCharlie|RogueCharlie]] 00:06, 16 September 2009 (MDT)
| |
