|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:VIPs"
(New page: Should the title of this page be expanded? I'm not sure as ingame they are known and read as "VIPs" ~~~~) |
|||
| (4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
[[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 08:54, 9 June 2008 (GMT) | [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 08:54, 9 June 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Test version for all to say yay or nay. Should we include those little icons to all commodities? I think they look justified, but that's just me. Comments anyone? [[User:Looqas|Looqas]] 15:31, 16 September 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Looks good to me, however I'd do away with the "Description" heading, since it seems redundant. Just have description text without the heading and it looks good. The icons look nice, so definitely keep them in. --[[User:Blodo|Blodo]] 21:11, 17 September 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | The Description heading is already in every commodity article, so I think we need to have a decision when Hyung finally makes the Commodities template. It's a bit redundant, but I personally don't mind about it (does not bother me). --[[User:Looqas|Looqas]] 05:59, 18 September 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Remove "description" from all commodities. It is redundant. I still have no idea what to put as a commodity template. I think for now, we should just say the infocard text and the icon.[[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 07:04, 18 September 2008 (GMT) | ||
Latest revision as of 07:04, 18 September 2008
Should the title of this page be expanded? I'm not sure as ingame they are known and read as "VIPs"
Chovynz 08:54, 9 June 2008 (GMT)
Test version for all to say yay or nay. Should we include those little icons to all commodities? I think they look justified, but that's just me. Comments anyone? Looqas 15:31, 16 September 2008 (GMT)
Looks good to me, however I'd do away with the "Description" heading, since it seems redundant. Just have description text without the heading and it looks good. The icons look nice, so definitely keep them in. --Blodo 21:11, 17 September 2008 (GMT)
The Description heading is already in every commodity article, so I think we need to have a decision when Hyung finally makes the Commodities template. It's a bit redundant, but I personally don't mind about it (does not bother me). --Looqas 05:59, 18 September 2008 (GMT)
Remove "description" from all commodities. It is redundant. I still have no idea what to put as a commodity template. I think for now, we should just say the infocard text and the icon.Chovynz 07:04, 18 September 2008 (GMT)
