|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:C6 Refueling Platform"
From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search (added comments) |
m (moved Talk:C6 Refuelling Platform to Talk:C6 Refueling Platform: "Refuelling" is a bad typo) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Don't think this can be considered a base, it's just an undockable structure. --Alex 14:13, 21 May 2010 (MDT) | Don't think this can be considered a base, it's just an undockable structure. --Alex 14:13, 21 May 2010 (MDT) | ||
| − | :While I understand the thinking behind this statement, I also disagree with deleting the page simply because it's "Not dockable." There is/was a template around that did have the intent of supporting those structures that are not dockable, however I have no idea what it called, or where it went. A simple way of | + | :While I understand the thinking behind this statement, I also disagree with deleting the page simply because it's "Not dockable." There is/was a template around that did have the intent of supporting those structures that are not dockable, however I have no idea what it called, or where it went. I know there was one, because I personally worked on it, but that was a long time ago. |
| + | :A simple way of allowing for these structures (And there are alot!) would be to adjust the [[:Template:Base Infobox]] and add the Non-docking parameters and info. It would be easy to do, considering '''''|docking = yes''''' is already there. Just make sure that the category is correctly applied as Non-Dockable Base or structure and it should fit into the wiki quite finely. [[User:Chovynz| ~Chovynz~ ]] <sup>([[User_talk:Chovynz|Blabs]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chovynz|Ego]]) (Wiki Admin) </sup> 22:06, 22 May 2010 (MDT) | ||
| + | ::I've removed the deletion flag. I figure it'll get hit with a fix-stick anyhow since it's on the outdated page list, but it IS a station and I think the "docking = no" covers things well enough. [[User:Sovereign|Sovereign]] 12:55, 3 August 2010 (MDT) | ||
Latest revision as of 13:15, 13 August 2011
Don't think this can be considered a base, it's just an undockable structure. --Alex 14:13, 21 May 2010 (MDT)
- While I understand the thinking behind this statement, I also disagree with deleting the page simply because it's "Not dockable." There is/was a template around that did have the intent of supporting those structures that are not dockable, however I have no idea what it called, or where it went. I know there was one, because I personally worked on it, but that was a long time ago.
- A simple way of allowing for these structures (And there are alot!) would be to adjust the Template:Base Infobox and add the Non-docking parameters and info. It would be easy to do, considering |docking = yes is already there. Just make sure that the category is correctly applied as Non-Dockable Base or structure and it should fit into the wiki quite finely. ~Chovynz~ (Blabs • Ego) (Wiki Admin) 22:06, 22 May 2010 (MDT)
- I've removed the deletion flag. I figure it'll get hit with a fix-stick anyhow since it's on the outdated page list, but it IS a station and I think the "docking = no" covers things well enough. Sovereign 12:55, 3 August 2010 (MDT)
