|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Version"
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:I'm not sure if we can check for another template, but we can add a parameter to the version template so that it doesn't include any categories. | :I'm not sure if we can check for another template, but we can add a parameter to the version template so that it doesn't include any categories. | ||
:--<span style="background-color: #F89406;padding:1px 3px 2px;-webkit-border-radius:3px;-moz-border-radius:3px;border-radius:3px;font-weight:bold;color:white;">[[User:Alex|Alex]]</span> 16:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | :--<span style="background-color: #F89406;padding:1px 3px 2px;-webkit-border-radius:3px;-moz-border-radius:3px;border-radius:3px;font-weight:bold;color:white;">[[User:Alex|Alex]]</span> 16:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Versions == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I highly recommend <nowiki>{{Outdated}}</nowiki> be replaced with <nowiki>{{#if: {{{2|}}} | | {{Outdated}}}}</nowiki>. Versions should not be assigned outside of this template, and because it is locked and almost never updated this is simply impossible. Historical articles should also never show as Outdated. | ||
| + | :''The above unsigned entry was written by [[User:Ipuvaepe|Ipuvaepe]] ([[User talk:Ipuvaepe|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Ipuvaepe|contribs]]) on '''23:43, 19 July 2012''''' | ||
| + | :Done. --<span style="background-color: #F89406;padding:1px 3px 2px;border-radius: 3px; -o-border-radius: 3px; -ms-border-radius: 3px; -webkit-border-radius:3px;-moz-border-radius:3px;border-radius:3px;font-weight:bold;color:white;">[[User:Alex|Alex]]</span> 17:08, 20 July 2012 (CEST) | ||
Latest revision as of 15:08, 20 July 2012
Category integration
Suggestion: Add oudated versions to the Category:Stubs. Alternatively, they should be added to an easy-to-reach thread like the To-Do page or similar. Currently one has to go to Categories and browse manually for it, or keep it bookmarked. Not really elegant, and I like being able to access them quickly to see what remains to be done. The Editing threads are a mess already, I know, but a somewhat more central placement surely would help.
Additionally: Currently old versions sometimes remain due to the Historical category (e.g. all currently existing 4.84 pages). Would there be a way to check if a "Historical" tag has been applied which then removes or at least puts it into a new category so it doesn't confuse with "To be updated" old versions? Maybe create a version category "v4.84 historical" or somesuch? -Senshi 11:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
- Maybe a category containing all pages marked as Outdated by this template?
- I'm not sure if we can check for another template, but we can add a parameter to the version template so that it doesn't include any categories.
- --Alex 16:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
Versions
I highly recommend {{Outdated}} be replaced with {{#if: {{{2|}}} | | {{Outdated}}}}. Versions should not be assigned outside of this template, and because it is locked and almost never updated this is simply impossible. Historical articles should also never show as Outdated.
