|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:OTC"
(Title and Stylistic Notes) |
|||
| (One intermediate revision by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
No problem I'ld be honored if you used the styles. The dark fits well with the new Wiki theme admins have applied, that's for sure. - Ivan | No problem I'ld be honored if you used the styles. The dark fits well with the new Wiki theme admins have applied, that's for sure. - Ivan | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | No idea who actually added OTC as zoner affiliated, but I'll remove that instantly. | ||
| + | ==Title and Stylistic Notes== | ||
| + | According to the [[style]] page, shouldn't this page have its full title, and then have a redirect from OTC heading here? It's just a minor point, but it would help make the wiki feel more cohesive. All in all, a pretty well made page. The infoboxes would probably look better on the right, rather than running in serial form with the rest of the content. | ||
| + | |||
| + | You might do well to make the titles main titles: | ||
| + | |||
| + | with <nowiki>==Formats like this==</nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | and not | ||
| + | |||
| + | <nowiki>===Formats like this===</nowiki> | ||
| + | |||
| + | as the topic titles are currently styled as sub-titles, which feels a bit off-putting in an article. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | Another note is that I found the use of an "infobox" to contain the amount of text given in Hierarchy section to be quite jarring. You might want to consider cutting down the descriptions in the infobox and turning them into summaries, and making sub-headings explaining what each does. | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I did not feel it was my place to change your wiki page so drastically, but if you like the sound of the changes, I would be happy to do most of the work for you over the next few days? | ||
| + | [[User:Korlus|Korlus]] ([[User talk:Korlus|talk]]) 21:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 21:32, 1 April 2013
Need to fill out the correct diplomacy, ship use, some small and nifty things and page is ready to be active. - Ivan
- This is a high quality page on the wiki. Well constructed, very informative, well thought out, nice formatting. I fully approve of the styles used. I'll bring up with the Wiki team if we could use them as a basis for other pages. Good job and well done. ~Chovynz~ (Blabs • Ego) 14:13, 11 September 2009 (MDT)
No problem I'ld be honored if you used the styles. The dark fits well with the new Wiki theme admins have applied, that's for sure. - Ivan
No idea who actually added OTC as zoner affiliated, but I'll remove that instantly.
Title and Stylistic Notes
According to the style page, shouldn't this page have its full title, and then have a redirect from OTC heading here? It's just a minor point, but it would help make the wiki feel more cohesive. All in all, a pretty well made page. The infoboxes would probably look better on the right, rather than running in serial form with the rest of the content.
You might do well to make the titles main titles:
with ==Formats like this==
and not
===Formats like this===
as the topic titles are currently styled as sub-titles, which feels a bit off-putting in an article.
Another note is that I found the use of an "infobox" to contain the amount of text given in Hierarchy section to be quite jarring. You might want to consider cutting down the descriptions in the infobox and turning them into summaries, and making sub-headings explaining what each does.
I did not feel it was my place to change your wiki page so drastically, but if you like the sound of the changes, I would be happy to do most of the work for you over the next few days?
Korlus (talk) 21:32, 1 April 2013 (UTC)
