|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Tau War"
(New page: I feel that the article is currently somewhat heavy on Consortium references compared with some of the other major participants such as the outcasts or colonial remnant who are not mention...) |
m (response) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I feel that the article is currently somewhat heavy on Consortium references compared with some of the other major participants such as the outcasts or colonial remnant who are not mentioned at all in the narrative. Also, would people be averse to me editing the causes of war to take into account my interpretation of the IMG role in the conflict as described in the Timeline of Bretonian History, and perhaps some better estimates of the forces of both sides, using my chart of BAF military strength as a template against which to estimate sizes of the other forces?--[[User:Pbrione|Pbrione]] 17:05, 8 January 2010 (MST) | I feel that the article is currently somewhat heavy on Consortium references compared with some of the other major participants such as the outcasts or colonial remnant who are not mentioned at all in the narrative. Also, would people be averse to me editing the causes of war to take into account my interpretation of the IMG role in the conflict as described in the Timeline of Bretonian History, and perhaps some better estimates of the forces of both sides, using my chart of BAF military strength as a template against which to estimate sizes of the other forces?--[[User:Pbrione|Pbrione]] 17:05, 8 January 2010 (MST) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I see no reason not to, it was originally written by the guy in charge of the Consortium ([[User:Ironwatsas|watsas]]). Since you've been the BAF fleet admiral for the whole conflict, you've got more insight into at least the Bretonian diplomacy. | ||
| + | [[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 18:30, 8 January 2010 (MST) | ||
Latest revision as of 01:30, 9 January 2010
I feel that the article is currently somewhat heavy on Consortium references compared with some of the other major participants such as the outcasts or colonial remnant who are not mentioned at all in the narrative. Also, would people be averse to me editing the causes of war to take into account my interpretation of the IMG role in the conflict as described in the Timeline of Bretonian History, and perhaps some better estimates of the forces of both sides, using my chart of BAF military strength as a template against which to estimate sizes of the other forces?--Pbrione 17:05, 8 January 2010 (MST)
I see no reason not to, it was originally written by the guy in charge of the Consortium (watsas). Since you've been the BAF fleet admiral for the whole conflict, you've got more insight into at least the Bretonian diplomacy. ~cshake (talk) (sysop) 18:30, 8 January 2010 (MST)
