YellowWarningTriangle.png This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date.

Difference between revisions of "Template talk:Version"

From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(Created page with "=Category integration= Suggestion: Add oudated versions to the '''Category:Stubs'''. Alternatively, they should be added to an easy-to-reach thread like the To-Do page or similar...")
 
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
Additionally: Currently old versions sometimes remain due to the Historical category (e.g. all currently existing 4.84 pages). Would there be a way to check if a "Historical" tag has been applied which then removes or at least puts it into a new category so it doesn't confuse with "To be updated" old versions? Maybe create a version category "v4.84 historical" or somesuch? -[[User:Senshi|Senshi]] 11:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 
Additionally: Currently old versions sometimes remain due to the Historical category (e.g. all currently existing 4.84 pages). Would there be a way to check if a "Historical" tag has been applied which then removes or at least puts it into a new category so it doesn't confuse with "To be updated" old versions? Maybe create a version category "v4.84 historical" or somesuch? -[[User:Senshi|Senshi]] 11:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:Maybe a category containing all pages marked as Outdated by this template?<br><br>
 +
:I'm not sure if we can check for another template, but we can add a parameter to the version template so that it doesn't include any categories.
 +
:--<span style="background-color: #F89406;padding:1px 3px 2px;-webkit-border-radius:3px;-moz-border-radius:3px;border-radius:3px;font-weight:bold;color:white;">[[User:Alex|Alex]]</span> 16:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:44, 17 January 2012

Category integration

Suggestion: Add oudated versions to the Category:Stubs. Alternatively, they should be added to an easy-to-reach thread like the To-Do page or similar. Currently one has to go to Categories and browse manually for it, or keep it bookmarked. Not really elegant, and I like being able to access them quickly to see what remains to be done. The Editing threads are a mess already, I know, but a somewhat more central placement surely would help.

Additionally: Currently old versions sometimes remain due to the Historical category (e.g. all currently existing 4.84 pages). Would there be a way to check if a "Historical" tag has been applied which then removes or at least puts it into a new category so it doesn't confuse with "To be updated" old versions? Maybe create a version category "v4.84 historical" or somesuch? -Senshi 11:06, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Maybe a category containing all pages marked as Outdated by this template?

I'm not sure if we can check for another template, but we can add a parameter to the version template so that it doesn't include any categories.
--Alex 16:44, 17 January 2012 (UTC)