Talk:IDs

Should we add the ID price to the wiki pages? We already have the system location only in effect. I would like to add the ID price as it makes the wiki better.
~Chovynz~ ^{(Blabs • Ego)} 05:50, 29 June 2009 (MDT)

Go for it --Tazuras 08:30, 29 June 2009 (MDT)

Bretonian Privateer ID

Snak3, you edited this page and stated that the Bretonian Privateer ID is not generic. It is in fact generic. It is owned by no specific organization (official or otherwise), no specific RP or storyline (to my knowledge), it is just as generic as Vigilante or Pirate. While I do indeed question the necessity of having such an ID, they are most definitely not a Police, Military, or other Autonomous Organization. Save for their own category, I do believe it would be most proper to file them under Generic. Ipuvaepe 13:49, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

It is not what you think or how you perceive it. Neither Privateer ID, nor is the Nomad Trial ID Generic IDs rule-wise. Neither of non-Liberty intelligence services has their faction of their own but they are not Generic IDs. Generic IDs are meant to be used because no fixed RP and ZoI is meant for them, but Privateer ID, Intelligence Service IDs and Nomad Trial ID has their preset RP and ZoI. Snak3 15:48, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

Here is the proof for my points: Link to forum post by Cannon Snak3 06:08, 29 August 2011 (UTC)

First I will ask whomever reads this, please do not be annoyed with my grammar for I am running chkdsk /r (2tB) on my primary and am left with a keyboardless netbook and OSK is painfully slow. This makes it hard to convey my thoughts, and thus my sentence structure may seem crude.

It must be pointed out that while I was indeed wrong to classify the two IDs as generic, your perceptions are no more significant. In retrospect, the nomad trial ID was a definite mistake (I never claimed otherwise, my post pertains only to the bret privateer) and the Bretonian Privateer being newly associated with the BAF (You may have noticed I placed this here but did not revert the edit, I deferred and called for discussion as per standard unsure etiquette.) it most definitely is not generic, actually more of an association that would go in the corporate box (I have not finished reading about this new system, so my immediate opinion should not be taken seriously) though this is neither the time nor the place.

As for the Intelligence Service IDs, I never dreamed of labeling them as generic let alone putting them in the box, wherever did you get that from? Ipuvaepe 03:39, 30 August 2011 (UTC)

Sections

I would suggest getting rid of the Military, Police, Guild, and Autonomous Organization IDs category, and replacing it with three categories, one titled House Police and Millitary, one titled Unlawfuls and an other for the other IDs. "Tracky 01:58, 29 August 2011 (UTC)"

There is absolutely no need for it, and even current sections of Corporate and Others make it quite hard to navigate and unneeded information. I will be talking with other Wiki Editors for possibility to remove them. When I created Generic ID section, those are clear to define and sort. As well as it is quite useful information for new players, especially those, wishing to create factions. There is anothet possibility to sort Corporate IDs: by adding "/corporation" to their affiliation. Snak3 05:57, 29 August 2011 (UTC)