Difference between revisions of "Talk:Fighters"
m (Made a mistake in compiling the relevant discussions) |
m (Reordered the discussion to make more sense and put the latest at the base of the sections. Date order descending) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Get rid of Pre-Disco Stats?== | ==Get rid of Pre-Disco Stats?== | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
===Stock Vs Discovery=== | ===Stock Vs Discovery=== | ||
| − | I've been thinking. This is a wiki for Discovery mod right? Anyone who comes here is usually looking for Disco info. So why are we putting Vanilla info in? As an example; it doesn't make sense to me to have [[Defender]] AND [[Defender (original)]] on this wiki. My feeling is stick with Disco stuff for the majority, as there is a tonne of stuff to put up just with that. We are doubling our work if we want to put the Vanilla variants up also. :( | + | I've been thinking. This is a wiki for Discovery mod right? Anyone who comes here is usually looking for Disco info. So why are we putting Vanilla info in? As an example; it doesn't make sense to me to have [[Defender]] AND [[Defender (original)]] on this wiki. My feeling is stick with Disco stuff for the majority, as there is a tonne of stuff to put up just with that. We are doubling our work if we want to put the Vanilla variants up also. :( [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 09:18, 21 May 2008 (GMT) |
| − | + | :Having vanilla info is just an extra. But it's nice to have it, to compare the changes Discovery has made to them. [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 09:57, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | |
| − | |||
| − | Having vanilla info is just an extra. But it's nice to have it, to compare the changes Discovery has made to them. | ||
| − | |||
| − | [[User:Nodwick|Nodwick]] 09:57, 21 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
===Formatting=== | ===Formatting=== | ||
| − | We need to have the ship lists formatted the same way. Currently [[Freighters]] is using "Pre-Discovery" while [[Fighters]] is using "Stock Fighters". "Pre-Disco" tells me that they are the original ones and shouldn't be in this list. I suggest that these lists are only for the Discovery ones (stock and new). One example of why I say this; Rhino in Vanilla costs around 8,000 whereas in Disco they cost around 43,000 and are sold in different places. Transports doesnt even have any pre-Disco/Stock. | + | <s>We need to have the ship lists formatted the same way. Currently [[Freighters]] is using "Pre-Discovery" while [[Fighters]] is using "Stock Fighters". "Pre-Disco" tells me that they are the original ones and shouldn't be in this list. I suggest that these lists are only for the Discovery ones (stock and new). One example of why I say this; Rhino in Vanilla costs around 8,000 whereas in Disco they cost around 43,000 and are sold in different places. Transports doesnt even have any pre-Disco/Stock. |
Other ship lists. | Other ship lists. | ||
| Line 20: | Line 12: | ||
*[[Cruisers]] | *[[Cruisers]] | ||
*[[Battleships]] | *[[Battleships]] | ||
| − | Talk copied into Freighters talk | + | Talk copied into Freighters talk</s> [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 03:45, 22 May 2008 (GMT) |
| − | [[User: | + | I agree with this. www.battleclinic.com handles Vanilla brilliantly, if people want stuff from vanilla point them there.[[User:Sovereign|Sovereign]] 02:37, 27 May 2008 (GMT) |
| − | + | :Dealt with [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 07:30, 2 August 2008 (GMT) | |
| − | [[ | + | ===Get rid of Pre-Disco Stats?=== |
| + | It seems to me that this'll just confuse people if we keep on mixing everything, so I propose we get rid of Pre-Disco stuff altogether (i.e. no separating into stock and Disco-added fighters). That's what the Freelancer wiki is for, but this isn't for the vanilla game, so I don't see a reason to have those stats. What're your opinions on this? [[F15pilotX]] 14:20 GMT, 29 May 2008 | ||
| + | :I agree with this. I think we should just put them into their classes instead of splitting the ships according to Stock and Disco. So what we'll end up with is, a list of Light fighters, Heavy fighters, Very heavy fighters, and no Stock or Disco. I'm willing to do this myself. One other thing is we have a double up of some of the fighters, (Talon, Sabre, Eagle are in both Stock lists and Disco lists. I was going to take them out of the Disco list, and then thought why dont we just merge the two lists.) [[User:Chovynz|Chovynz]] 07:19, 2 August 2008 (GMT) | ||
| Line 50: | Line 44: | ||
| Example, doesn't exist in game | | Example, doesn't exist in game | ||
|} | |} | ||
| + | |||
== Add a weapon class column? == | == Add a weapon class column? == | ||
| Line 66: | Line 61: | ||
--[[User:Adamantine Fist|Adamantine Fist]] 02:58, 31 May 2008 (GMT) | --[[User:Adamantine Fist|Adamantine Fist]] 02:58, 31 May 2008 (GMT) | ||
| + | |||
== Vanilla stats (and Crusader) == | == Vanilla stats (and Crusader) == | ||
Revision as of 07:30, 2 August 2008
Get rid of Pre-Disco Stats?
Stock Vs Discovery
I've been thinking. This is a wiki for Discovery mod right? Anyone who comes here is usually looking for Disco info. So why are we putting Vanilla info in? As an example; it doesn't make sense to me to have Defender AND Defender (original) on this wiki. My feeling is stick with Disco stuff for the majority, as there is a tonne of stuff to put up just with that. We are doubling our work if we want to put the Vanilla variants up also. :( Chovynz 09:18, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
- Having vanilla info is just an extra. But it's nice to have it, to compare the changes Discovery has made to them. Nodwick 09:57, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
Formatting
We need to have the ship lists formatted the same way. Currently Freighters is using "Pre-Discovery" while Fighters is using "Stock Fighters". "Pre-Disco" tells me that they are the original ones and shouldn't be in this list. I suggest that these lists are only for the Discovery ones (stock and new). One example of why I say this; Rhino in Vanilla costs around 8,000 whereas in Disco they cost around 43,000 and are sold in different places. Transports doesnt even have any pre-Disco/Stock.
Other ship lists.
Talk copied into Freighters talk Chovynz 03:45, 22 May 2008 (GMT)
I agree with this. www.battleclinic.com handles Vanilla brilliantly, if people want stuff from vanilla point them there.Sovereign 02:37, 27 May 2008 (GMT)
- Dealt with Chovynz 07:30, 2 August 2008 (GMT)
Get rid of Pre-Disco Stats?
It seems to me that this'll just confuse people if we keep on mixing everything, so I propose we get rid of Pre-Disco stuff altogether (i.e. no separating into stock and Disco-added fighters). That's what the Freelancer wiki is for, but this isn't for the vanilla game, so I don't see a reason to have those stats. What're your opinions on this? F15pilotX 14:20 GMT, 29 May 2008
- I agree with this. I think we should just put them into their classes instead of splitting the ships according to Stock and Disco. So what we'll end up with is, a list of Light fighters, Heavy fighters, Very heavy fighters, and no Stock or Disco. I'm willing to do this myself. One other thing is we have a double up of some of the fighters, (Talon, Sabre, Eagle are in both Stock lists and Disco lists. I was going to take them out of the Disco list, and then thought why dont we just merge the two lists.) Chovynz 07:19, 2 August 2008 (GMT)
Format for posting (Use the "Edit" function to see it)
| Name | Weapons | Cargo | Hull | NB/SB | Price | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Example 1 | 6/1 | 75 | 18200 | 65 | $2,000,000 | Example, doesn't exist in game |
Add a weapon class column?
If someone thinks this is a good idea and is willing to add it, go ahead.
The above, unsigned entry was made by User:Chovynz.
I like it this way, to be honest.
Nodwick 09:57, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
Links & Individual Fighter Pages
I've linked all the ships to their respective pages, whether those pages exist or not, and set up the pages for all Disco VHFs, the Executioner, and a good chunk of the MK II LFs.
--Adamantine Fist 02:58, 31 May 2008 (GMT)
Vanilla stats (and Crusader)
Hello!
Crusader was left out in the stock ships, so I added it. I wrote the Disco stats in, and then realized vanilla stats are used there... So now the Crusader has "wrong" stats... I don't know the vanilla stats, so I can't repair it.
But I also don't understand why the vanilla stats are used there instead of the discovery stats? Because stats of the modified ships are nowhere in the article. I would understand it if the modified ships were somewhere else on the page... still, I am new on the wiki, so I don't really know your intentions with the page. (Edit (2nd): it seems just several ships have vanilla stats in the table)
— MarvinCZ 13:49, 5 July 2008 (GMT)
