Difference between revisions of "Talk:Style Guide Commodities"
(3 suggestions) |
|||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
--[[User:0815fips|0815fips]] 12:55, 29 October 2008 (GMT+1) | --[[User:0815fips|0815fips]] 12:55, 29 October 2008 (GMT+1) | ||
| + | |||
| + | : No need for thumb. It was just a way to have those frames, which can be done with "frame". I think we can change all the commodities to be like what you suggested. The thing with commodities is that there are going to come a lot of new ones in 4.85 and the selling locations of the old ones can change too. So putting a lot of effort right now can be somewhat waste of time. It's good to think the template ready before 4.85. I have no opinion about the point 2) or 3) you raise. | ||
Revision as of 13:54, 29 October 2008
This is all I can think of to do for the commodities. Discuss.Chovynz 07:19, 18 September 2008 (GMT)
Looks good. Put a link to an example commodity in the article. And you forgot the Category:Commodities. I removed all the Description headings (as you may have noticed). I've also PMed Igiss and asked if he can help us out getting those icons without having to screenshot them individually. How to dig up the text from the mod files? --Looqas 07:28, 18 September 2008 (GMT)
1. I think "Image:any.jpg|frame|right|anything" would be better than "Image:any.jpg|thumb|right|anything", because you don't see the ugly and unnecessary "Enlarge"-symbol.
2. Shouldn't we add mining locations to an own list like the availability?
3. Is it better to rename availability to selling locations, because we have to add another heading - mining locations?
--0815fips 12:55, 29 October 2008 (GMT+1)
- No need for thumb. It was just a way to have those frames, which can be done with "frame". I think we can change all the commodities to be like what you suggested. The thing with commodities is that there are going to come a lot of new ones in 4.85 and the selling locations of the old ones can change too. So putting a lot of effort right now can be somewhat waste of time. It's good to think the template ready before 4.85. I have no opinion about the point 2) or 3) you raise.
