Difference between revisions of "User talk:Dab"

From Discovery Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
Since two of their allies were Hogosha and Gaians, I assumed it appropriate to have GC on the enemy list, especially since the GC faction (NPC) has Corsairs on their enemy list. It should be accurate, not just carbon-copies of the infocard.
 
Since two of their allies were Hogosha and Gaians, I assumed it appropriate to have GC on the enemy list, especially since the GC faction (NPC) has Corsairs on their enemy list. It should be accurate, not just carbon-copies of the infocard.
 
[[User:Dab|Dab]] 17:22, 15 September 2009 (MDT)
 
[[User:Dab|Dab]] 17:22, 15 September 2009 (MDT)
 +
:That might be appropriate for the player factions but the NPC pages must accurately show what is displayed in game. It took me several hours to go back and forth between the individual wiki pages and the appropriate cards in F8 to match everything exactly, as I was instructed to do by the wiki hosts. [[User:RogueCharlie|RogueCharlie]] 20:40, 15 September 2009 (MDT)
  
 
==Border Worlds & Edge Worlds==
 
==Border Worlds & Edge Worlds==

Revision as of 02:40, 16 September 2009

Diplomacy

I made sure the NPC diplomacy matches in game information exactly. Golden Chrysanthemums are not listed as an enemy of the Corsairs in game (Using F8) so I undid your false edit. Player faction diplomacy belongs on player faction pages, the NPC pages must match in-game information precisely. RogueCharlie 14:36, 15 September 2009 (MDT)

Since two of their allies were Hogosha and Gaians, I assumed it appropriate to have GC on the enemy list, especially since the GC faction (NPC) has Corsairs on their enemy list. It should be accurate, not just carbon-copies of the infocard. Dab 17:22, 15 September 2009 (MDT)

That might be appropriate for the player factions but the NPC pages must accurately show what is displayed in game. It took me several hours to go back and forth between the individual wiki pages and the appropriate cards in F8 to match everything exactly, as I was instructed to do by the wiki hosts. RogueCharlie 20:40, 15 September 2009 (MDT)

Border Worlds & Edge Worlds

04:01 (cur; last) . . Dab (Talk | contribs | block) (Border Systems moved to Border Worlds
over redirect: The Border Worlds are designated as Border Worlds, not Border Systems in in-game
rumors/infocards (especially in relation to the BW ship line) and in the game/mod files. 
Being designated 'BW' fo)

04:01 (cur; last) . . Dab (Talk | contribs | block) (Edge Systems moved to Edge Worlds over redirect:
The Edge Worlds are designated as Edge Worlds, not Edge Systems in in-game rumors/infocards and in
the game/mod files. Being designated 'EW' for Edge Worlds. It'd only make it more confusing and in)

You'll notice I left the redirects in? If people search for Border Worlds or Border Systems, they will go to the same place. IMHO this is a developer issue and needs to be fixed. If you seriously have a problem with having a simple wiki redirect to the places, then I'll just have to get them changed ingame, won't I. :) ~Chovynz~ (BlabsEgo) 17:23, 4 September 2009 (MDT)

It's not that I have a problem with the wiki redirecting to places, it's the fact that these places literially ARE called the Border WORLDS. The ship line is even named for it; Border World Shipline. Check out the Sabre's page. The word World fits this much better than 'systems.' Systems is more defining of a solar system. While the Border Worlds may encompass more than solar systems. It also includes the areas between the solar systems and the area that encompasses the many solar systems that are a part of the Border Worlds. The original designation is the more accurate of the two. Dab