|
This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "User talk:Cshake"
(→http://cshake.homeip.net/flwiki/: Torpedoes comments.) |
RogueCharlie (talk | contribs) |
||
| (30 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==My content generator== | ==My content generator== | ||
| − | ==http://cshake.homeip.net/flwiki/== | + | ===http://cshake.homeip.net/flwiki/=== |
Will change often, if it looks weird or has ugly looking output, I'm probably working on it while you're using it. Leave me a message here if you're unsure if it's producing something usable. | Will change often, if it looks weird or has ugly looking output, I'm probably working on it while you're using it. Leave me a message here if you're unsure if it's producing something usable. | ||
:-[[User:Cshake|cshake]] 22:14, 24 September 2009 (MDT) | :-[[User:Cshake|cshake]] 22:14, 24 September 2009 (MDT) | ||
| − | === | + | ====Content Errors==== |
| − | + | The Hornviper MK I and MK II are both listed as beeing sold on Red Hessian bases by the content generator. FLstat disagrees [http://discoverygc.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=67086&st=2]. I have verified this using FLstat. [[User:Tazuras|Tazuras]] 12:02, 4 May 2010 (MDT) | |
| − | + | Fixed, turns out it was finding "rh_gun01_mark04" at the red hessian bases because they sell "fc_rh_gun01_mark04". Oops. [[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 13:37, 4 May 2010 (MDT) | |
| − | === | + | === Class 7 Nomad Turrets === |
| − | + | As per your request, here's a link to how I handled it on the DUSA wiki: [http://wiki.discovery-usa.com/?title=Class_7_Turrets Class 7 Turrets] [[RogueCharlie| ~RogueCharlie~ ]] <sup>([[User_talk:RogueCharlie|Blabs]] • [[Special:Contributions/RogueCharlie|Ego]]) </sup> 04:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC) | |
| − | |||
| − | + | === Asco Torpedo === | |
| + | This item is found in the Missiles list but belongs in the Capital Ship forward Guns page. It is a forward gun for the Gallic Brigands Asco Gunboat. | ||
| − | + | Here is how I handled it: [http://wiki.discovery-usa.com/?title=Capital_Ship_Forward_Guns Capital Ship Forward Guns] [[RogueCharlie| ~RogueCharlie~ ]] <sup>([[User_talk:RogueCharlie|Blabs]] • [[Special:Contributions/RogueCharlie|Ego]]) </sup> | |
| − | | | ||
| − | + | ==Thanks== | |
| − | + | I really appreciate what you are doing for this wiki. Thanks man. [[User:Chovynz| ~Chovynz~ ]] <sup>([[User_talk:Chovynz|Blabs]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chovynz|Ego]]) </sup> 12:59, 23 September 2009 (MDT) | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Hello it's Cyber here, i cant find where to send msn so I have to do this. Thank you for instruction, im reading others' edits to learn the code. About the summaries n previews, I used cellphone so it was a bit annoying. Im willing to help u with more than just review, just teach me. | |
| − | + | U can delete this. Thanks again. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | == idea: disclaimer == | |
| − | + | Quite often I try to explain the tech chart to new players and get 'i read it on the wiki' as the response. | |
| − | + | Prehaps add a disclaimer as part of the template for ships and weapons basicly saying to read the tech chart for the server being used rather than relying on the wiki as an accurate source. | |
| − | + | That, or add to the sidebar a 'server rules' tab, and link to sub-pages for the various servers rules (and delete a servers sub-page or mark as out dated if not updated within a set period of time) | |
| − | + | --[[Image:Muddwiki.png]] [[user:Kashiwaba_Tomoe|Tomoe]] 00:56, 4 August 2010 (MDT) | |
| − | + | :I'm not entirely sure what you mean - ships and weapons here don't say who can use them, just who made them. The only usage notes I can think of here are the disclaimers on battleships saying you need the guard ID to use it. The [[Ship Portal]], [[Ship Equipment]], [[ID]], and other pages include a link to the [[Tech Chart]] page in the first section, which explicitly says that "i read it on the wiki" is not a valid excuse. I admit that it could be more visible, and will add some more links, but I won't go so far as to put it in large red font on the front page (for the sake of all of us that already know). | |
| − | + | :[[:User:Cshake|~cshake]] <sup>([[:User_Talk:Cshake|talk]]) (sysop)</sup> 17:00, 4 August 2010 (MDT) | |
| − | + | ---Yeah, all Im saying is make it a tad visable. I dunno how they coulda got what they got from the wiki either, but hey it was folks that actualy listend and read the chart rather than just ignoring or making rude comments for a change, so I cant complain too much. --[[Image:Muddwiki.png]] [[user:Kashiwaba_Tomoe|Tomoe]] 17:09, 4 August 2010 (MDT) | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | === | + | ==White BG that went unnoticed== |
| − | |||
| − | + | Hi, Chris, I just saw that there still is at least one small bit of white BG remaining on the wiki which seems to have stayed unnoticed by us for a while. Anyway, if you want to fix it, its on the search page as it can be seen here: [http://discoveryfl.com/wiki/index.php?title=Special%3ASearch&search=&fulltext=Search] "[[User:Tracky|Tracky]] 04:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)" | |
| − | I | ||
| − | == | + | == Come on skype sometime == |
| − | We | + | I finally have rights to the wiki server. We can install extensions etc. now at will. --[[User:Blodo|Blodo]] 01:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 06:33, 13 January 2012
My content generator
http://cshake.homeip.net/flwiki/
Will change often, if it looks weird or has ugly looking output, I'm probably working on it while you're using it. Leave me a message here if you're unsure if it's producing something usable.
- -cshake 22:14, 24 September 2009 (MDT)
Content Errors
The Hornviper MK I and MK II are both listed as beeing sold on Red Hessian bases by the content generator. FLstat disagrees [1]. I have verified this using FLstat. Tazuras 12:02, 4 May 2010 (MDT)
Fixed, turns out it was finding "rh_gun01_mark04" at the red hessian bases because they sell "fc_rh_gun01_mark04". Oops. ~cshake (talk) (sysop) 13:37, 4 May 2010 (MDT)
Class 7 Nomad Turrets
As per your request, here's a link to how I handled it on the DUSA wiki: Class 7 Turrets ~RogueCharlie~ (Blabs • Ego) 04:41, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
Asco Torpedo
This item is found in the Missiles list but belongs in the Capital Ship forward Guns page. It is a forward gun for the Gallic Brigands Asco Gunboat.
Here is how I handled it: Capital Ship Forward Guns ~RogueCharlie~ (Blabs • Ego)
Thanks
I really appreciate what you are doing for this wiki. Thanks man. ~Chovynz~ (Blabs • Ego) 12:59, 23 September 2009 (MDT)
Hello it's Cyber here, i cant find where to send msn so I have to do this. Thank you for instruction, im reading others' edits to learn the code. About the summaries n previews, I used cellphone so it was a bit annoying. Im willing to help u with more than just review, just teach me. U can delete this. Thanks again.
idea: disclaimer
Quite often I try to explain the tech chart to new players and get 'i read it on the wiki' as the response. Prehaps add a disclaimer as part of the template for ships and weapons basicly saying to read the tech chart for the server being used rather than relying on the wiki as an accurate source. That, or add to the sidebar a 'server rules' tab, and link to sub-pages for the various servers rules (and delete a servers sub-page or mark as out dated if not updated within a set period of time)
--
Tomoe 00:56, 4 August 2010 (MDT)
- I'm not entirely sure what you mean - ships and weapons here don't say who can use them, just who made them. The only usage notes I can think of here are the disclaimers on battleships saying you need the guard ID to use it. The Ship Portal, Ship Equipment, ID, and other pages include a link to the Tech Chart page in the first section, which explicitly says that "i read it on the wiki" is not a valid excuse. I admit that it could be more visible, and will add some more links, but I won't go so far as to put it in large red font on the front page (for the sake of all of us that already know).
- ~cshake (talk) (sysop) 17:00, 4 August 2010 (MDT)
---Yeah, all Im saying is make it a tad visable. I dunno how they coulda got what they got from the wiki either, but hey it was folks that actualy listend and read the chart rather than just ignoring or making rude comments for a change, so I cant complain too much. --
Tomoe 17:09, 4 August 2010 (MDT)
White BG that went unnoticed
Hi, Chris, I just saw that there still is at least one small bit of white BG remaining on the wiki which seems to have stayed unnoticed by us for a while. Anyway, if you want to fix it, its on the search page as it can be seen here: [2] "Tracky 04:22, 21 April 2011 (UTC)"
Come on skype sometime
I finally have rights to the wiki server. We can install extensions etc. now at will. --Blodo 01:56, 13 January 2012 (UTC)
