|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | == Talk Page == | | == Talk Page == |
| − | | + | ONOZ EMPTINESS. Leave me a message if you've got something to tell me and do not wish to use Skype or the forum's PM function. |
| − | Please integrate the pages I have [[:Category:Pages_up_for_deletion|proposed for deletion]] into the [[Rheinland Military]] or [[Rheinland Military (player faction)]] article, they do not require their own separate articles, let alone their own categories. [[User:Tazuras|Tazuras]] 11:48, 22 June 2009 (MDT)
| |
| − | | |
| − | == Signature ==
| |
| − | | |
| − | You need to fix your signature, there are unclosed tags that break text formatting after your signature. Close the tags or remove them, please. <span style="white-space:pre;">-- [[User:Eyvind|Eyvind]] ([[User_talk:Eyvind|talk]] • [[Special:Contributions/Eyvind|contrib]]) </span> 09:41, 28 February 2009 (MST)
| |
| − | | |
| − | Ah, thanks for pointing it out to me. Done now. {{User:Nathrael/Sig}}
| |
| − | | |
| − | == You've been saying weird stuff. What's up?==
| |
| − | [[Manhattan]] - ''"09:16, 26 March 2009 Nathrael (Neither ships nor commodities sold or *bought* should be listed. The "Economy"(/Commodities/whatever) section is a placeholder for yet-to-be-inserted flavor texts.)"''
| |
| − | :They should actually. It's all part of the information about that place. Ships available should go in a <nowiki>{{Spoiler|list}}</nowiki> format and commodities could as well. I fully intended on having them in each page, from the very begining. Because of the lack of <nowiki>{{Spoiler}}</nowiki>, and Igiss's wanting people to "discover" things, I respected that and didn't put them on before, because we didnt have a spoiler tag. I know this quote from you is old, but is this still your stance?
| |
| − | | |
| − | :Now? there is every reason to include them. As for Flavour texts, I'm not quite sure what you mean by them. Can you clarify? I don't see a point to having flavour texts in a planet. It's quite... plainly just a planet/base.
| |
| − | | |
| − | ''(→F - c'mon, we all know what "FU" is really used for.)''
| |
| − | :"FU" is used ingame as Form Up. No need to remove it, or point out that other meaning, since we "all know it". It's also inappropriate and bording on being sanctionable. If the context is understood as form up (usually said in group with other things going on) there's no need to remove this entry from the [[Glossary]].
| |
| − | | |
| − | Cheers :) [[User:Chovynz| ~Chovynz~ ]] <sup>([[User_talk:Chovynz|Blabs]] • [[Special:Contributions/Chovynz|Ego]]) </sup> 15:06, 31 August 2009 (MDT)
| |
