This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date. |
Difference between revisions of "Talk:New York"
m |
m |
||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
Should we think about if there are anything to be improved in the infobox's data fields? I mean is the "House space" item really needed (and should we have there Liberty) and what about the owner? I think we should follow the game's example in this owner matter. And in this case it's the LPI. Discussion is needed before we apply this nice template to other systems as well. I like the current picture. That's what I had in mind more or less. It gives a bit of an idea what New York looks like; the colors etc. --[[User:Looqas|Looqas]] 23:28, 23 October 2008 (MDT) | Should we think about if there are anything to be improved in the infobox's data fields? I mean is the "House space" item really needed (and should we have there Liberty) and what about the owner? I think we should follow the game's example in this owner matter. And in this case it's the LPI. Discussion is needed before we apply this nice template to other systems as well. I like the current picture. That's what I had in mind more or less. It gives a bit of an idea what New York looks like; the colors etc. --[[User:Looqas|Looqas]] 23:28, 23 October 2008 (MDT) | ||
− | :Well, I don't know. The LPI is only the system's owner gameplay-wise, but from an IC position, they are just a corporation and not the government. I'd give IC information the priority over gameplay infos, but well, maybe we should make a poll or discuss this in the Wiki Editor Skype channel. The "World" category isn't really needed for House systems, that's true, but when you look at the Border- and Edge Worlds, it would come in handy in my opinion, as the BW and the EW are owned by a large number of | + | :Well, I don't know. The LPI is only the system's owner gameplay-wise, but from an IC position, they are just a corporation and not the government. I'd give IC information the priority over gameplay infos, but well, maybe we should make a poll or discuss this in the Wiki Editor Skype channel. The "World" category isn't really needed for House systems, that's true, but when you look at the Border- and Edge Worlds, it would come in handy in my opinion, as the BW and the EW are owned by a large number of factions. |
:--[[User:Nathrael|Nathrael]] 05:47, 24 October 2008 (MDT) | :--[[User:Nathrael|Nathrael]] 05:47, 24 October 2008 (MDT) |
Revision as of 11:50, 24 October 2008
What are we going to do about normal Systems? The infocard is only simple:
It doesnt take in account all the discovery additions.
Chovynz 08:22, 22 May 2008 (GMT)
I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example).
When we update this info, we could offer the updated content to the Admins to add it in the next version, that would improve Discovery, I think.
Nodwick 07:10, 21 May 2008 (GMT)
Is the word "System" in the title meant to capitalised? Tumble-Weed (ComLink) (Holocron) 11:01, 4 June 2008 (GMT)
Okay, about "criminals". Junkers are more of a neutral party, is it fair to them to lump them in with Outcasts and Rogues? it might set a bad model to follow for newbies if they think "Oh, hey, the Wiki said they're unlawfuls, so PEW PEW PEW I r TeH uBeR pWnZ0r Junker killah!"
Boss 16:22, 5 June 2008 (GMT)
- You have a good point. I just put it in that way as that was what was on the infocard. When you read about Liberty system it lumps Junkers under Criminals. I don't like it either, but im not editing it. Someone else can (Tumble-weed :) ) Or we can talk to Igiss about changing the system infocard slightly to reflect the more accurate Lawful, Neutral, Criminals or something.
- Chovynz 22:14, 5 June 2008 (GMT)
I think the system picture should be bigger, like almost touching the infobox frame. --Looqas 00:03, 23 October 2008 (MDT)
- I'll try to edit the template to allow a larger picture, just like I said on the forums.
- --Nathrael 05:19, 23 October 2008 (MDT)
- Done. It's a little bit larger now, though I don't think making the thumbnail size bigger would look too good. You can click on the thumbnail for a full 1024*768-screenshot, though.
- --Nathrael 07:01, 23 October 2008 (MDT)
Should we think about if there are anything to be improved in the infobox's data fields? I mean is the "House space" item really needed (and should we have there Liberty) and what about the owner? I think we should follow the game's example in this owner matter. And in this case it's the LPI. Discussion is needed before we apply this nice template to other systems as well. I like the current picture. That's what I had in mind more or less. It gives a bit of an idea what New York looks like; the colors etc. --Looqas 23:28, 23 October 2008 (MDT)
- Well, I don't know. The LPI is only the system's owner gameplay-wise, but from an IC position, they are just a corporation and not the government. I'd give IC information the priority over gameplay infos, but well, maybe we should make a poll or discuss this in the Wiki Editor Skype channel. The "World" category isn't really needed for House systems, that's true, but when you look at the Border- and Edge Worlds, it would come in handy in my opinion, as the BW and the EW are owned by a large number of factions.
- --Nathrael 05:47, 24 October 2008 (MDT)