YellowWarningTriangle.png This wiki is closed in favour of the new wiki. Information shown is likely to be very out of date.

Talk:New York

From Discovery Wiki
Revision as of 07:45, 15 July 2008 by Chovynz (talk | contribs) (Talk:New York moved to Talk:New York System over redirect: Revert. There are too many pages that already refer to this page. And other people have already adopted this methodology. I feel it would confuse people even more. I'll just put up with "N)
Jump to navigationJump to search

What are we going to do about normal Systems? The infocard is only simple:
It doesnt take in account all the discovery additions.

Chovynz 08:22, 22 May 2008 (GMT)

I think this would be quite ok, but it should be updated to reflect Discovery changes. And I think we should also note what can be mined in the system (wouldn't be very spectacular in New York, but it might be interesting for Colorado, for example).

When we update this info, we could offer the updated content to the Admins to add it in the next version, that would improve Discovery, I think.

Nodwick 07:10, 21 May 2008 (GMT)

Is the word "System" in the title meant to capitalised? Tumble-Weed (ComLink) (Holocron) 11:01, 4 June 2008 (GMT)

Okay, about "criminals". Junkers are more of a neutral party, is it fair to them to lump them in with Outcasts and Rogues? it might set a bad model to follow for newbies if they think "Oh, hey, the Wiki said they're unlawfuls, so PEW PEW PEW I r TeH uBeR pWnZ0r Junker killah!"

Boss 16:22, 5 June 2008 (GMT)

You have a good point. I just put it in that way as that was what was on the infocard. When you read about Liberty system it lumps Junkers under Criminals. I don't like it either, but im not editing it. Someone else can (Tumble-weed :) ) Or we can talk to Igiss about changing the system infocard slightly to reflect the more accurate Lawful, Neutral, Criminals or something.
Chovynz 22:14, 5 June 2008 (GMT)