Difference between revisions of "Talk:Guard Systems"
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
That would create a lot of arguments and people getting pissed off I think.. | That would create a lot of arguments and people getting pissed off I think.. | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[User:F15pilotX|F15pilotX]] , 2:10 16 May 2008 (GMT): | ||
Revision as of 01:11, 16 May 2008
Wouldn't it be better to have the information about who controls which systems on the Faction pages?
Nodwick 17:28, 13 May 2008 (GMT)
Yes, but it should be available on this page as well, in my opinion. Besides, is it Golden Chrysanthemum or Chrysanthemums (with an "s" at the end)? Since Kuraine wrote it without the "s" here but with the "s" in Kusari Player Factions. --Sleipnir 18:36, 13 May 2008 (GMT)
I don't like redundant information normally, but if you think it's better...
About GC: if you are unsure, don't change it, someone who is sure (preferrably one from GC) will correct it.
I see what you mean with "redundant". Still, this page supplies the reader with a list of all guard systems, gathered on one page. If a reader is selectively searching for the guard systems in general, in a "where-should-I-not-go"-way, this page will be way more useful to him than browsing through all faction pages.
--Sleipnir 21:06, 13 May 2008 (GMT)
You have a point there. Just let the page be.
Probably we should also put up a map with ALL systems/bases/jump gates/etc., clickable, with a page for each system/base/etc.?
Nodwick 07:32, 14 May 2008 (GMT)
That would create a lot of arguments and people getting pissed off I think..
F15pilotX , 2:10 16 May 2008 (GMT):
